issue of limitation would be covered by the residuary Article i.e. Article 113 of
the said Act. However the Appellate Bench of the Small ... limitation is
concerned. The two Articles of the Limitation Act which are in contention are
Article 51 and Article 113. The said Articles are reproduced
question of application of any of the Articles under the Limitation Act , much less residuary Article 113. He, however, as an alternate plank strenuously contended ... limitation is prescribed specifically under any of the Articles it would be the residuary Article 113 that would be applicable to such an ejectment suit
specific articles prescribing a period of limitation, it must fail
within the residuary article. The purpose of the residuary article is to
provide for cases ... accrues. Under Article 120 it was six
years which has been reduced to three years under Article
113. According to the third column in Article
taken as first cause of action for filing the suit, under Article 58 of the Limitation Act , the suit is within time being filed within ... dismissal from service was bad. The Supreme Court held that Article 113 of the Limitation Act applied. Whether it is Article 113 or Article
Article 66 or Article 67 would be applicable to the
facts of this case and there is no scope of the
application of Article 113 ... forfeiture or breach of condition. Article 67
stipulates a period of twelve years when the tenancy is
determined. Article 113 deals with suit for which
Article 90 since it is in respect of an injunction
wrongfully obtained or, in the alternative, by the residuary article,
namely, Article 113 ... obtained? If it is the former, Article 80 would
apply; If latter, Article 90; and if neither, Article 113 would govern the
case. Besides
Article-18 and Article-55 of Part-II, Article-113 of Part-X and
Article-137 of Part-II of the Limitation Act read ... schedule. Therefore, unless a finding is recorded that Article 18 does
not apply, Article 113 cannot apply. I do not see any reason why Article
limitation. That the first Appellate Court has erroneously relied upon
Article 113 of the Limitation Act , which has no application to the
present case ... Prasada Rao (2020) 3 SCC 289, Mr. Naik would submit that
Article 113 of the Limitation Act would apply in the facts and
circumstances
limitation. That the first Appellate Court has erroneously relied upon
Article 113 of the Limitation Act , which has no application to the
present case ... Prasada Rao (2020) 3 SCC 289, Mr. Naik would submit that
Article 113 of the Limitation Act would apply in the facts and
circumstances
limitation. That the first Appellate Court has erroneously relied upon
Article 113 of the Limitation Act , which has no application to the
present case ... Prasada Rao (2020) 3 SCC 289, Mr. Naik would submit that
Article 113 of the Limitation Act would apply in the facts and
circumstances
