that in spite of change the interpretation of Article 181 would apply to Article 137 of the Limitation Act . This Court in Nityananda Joshi ... Limitation Act 1963 compared with Article 181 of the 1908 Limitation Act shows that applications contemplated under Article 137 are not applications confined
principle of interpretation
of article 181 on the basis of ejusdem generis should be
-applied when interpreting the new article 137. This word
"other ... earlier articles and,
consequently, in interpreting this article, regard must be
had to the provisions contained in all the earlier articles.
The other articles
question arose as to what
applications are covered under Article 137 of the Schedule to the
Limitation Act . It was argued that an application made ... courts, are now to
be governed for purposes of limitation by Article 137.”
Similarly, in Nityananda, M. Joshi & Ors. v. Life Insurance
Corporation
Limitation Act, 1963
compared with Article 181 of the 1908
Limitation Act shows that applications
contemplated under Article 137 are not
applications confined ... would apply to suits
to which no other article in the schedule
applies."
14. Article 137 of the Limitation Act reads as follows
with a civil action, and
would be covered by Article 137 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 .
An action taken by a claimant ... under Section 11 , it would be covered by the residual provision Article 137 of
the Limitation Act, 1963 .
Article 137 of the Limitation
Gopal Bhiva , on Article 181 of the 1908-Act on the basis of ejusdem generis should be applied to Article 137 of 1963-Act also ... only slightly different from that of Article 181 of the 1908-Act. That is, in interpreting Article 137 of the 1963-Act regard must
held that the provisions of Article 181 (now Article 137 ) of the Limitation
Act apply only to applications which were made under the Code ... earlier articles, arid,
consequently, in interpreting this article, regard must be had to the
provisions contained in all the earlier articles. The other articles
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20(1) read with Articles
137 and 113 , Limitation Act, 1963 -Application to appoint
arbitrator-Period of limitation-Three years from ... ground that the very application under Section
20 was barred by Articles 137 & Article 113 of the
Limitation Act, 1963 ,
The present appeal
that in spite of change the inter-
pretation of Article 181 would apply to Article 137 of the
Limitation Act . This Court in Nityananda Joshi ... Limitation
Act 1963 compared with Article 181 of the 1908 Limitation
Act shows that applications contemplated under Article 137
are not applications confined
considered by this Court in the above
was as to whether Article 137 of the Schedule of the
Limitation Act, 1963 governs applications under Section ... Limitation Act, 1963
compared with Article 181 of the 1908
Limitation Act shows that applications
contemplated under Article 137 are not
applications confined
