Bhiva , wherein it was ruled that Article 181 of the Old Limitation Act, 1908 (to which Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 corresponds), applies ... Limitation Act, 1963 compared with Article 181 of the 1908 Limitation Act shows that applications contemplated under Article 137 are not applications confined
repeal of the Limitation Act of 1908 and replacement of article 181 by article 137 a controversy is again raised whether article 137 applies only ... that article 137 is not wider in its scope than article 181 and article 137 would only apply to applications made under the Code Civil
Union Of India vs Gujarat State Electricity Corporation ... on 21 October, 2016
Author: S.R
petition before the District Judge, Tellicherry was barred by limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act . The Board had contended that the notice intimating ... file their petition for compensation before the District Judge under Article 137 of the 1963 Limitation Act within three years from the accrual
Limitation Act, 1963 compared with Article 181 of the 109 Limitation Act shows that applications contemplated under Article 137 are not applications confined ... 137 stands the isolation from all other Article in Part I of the third division. Article 137 includes applications within the word "applications
application converted into suit was barred by
law of limitation.
3.3 Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 , was
relied on to contend that ... petition (sic
Article) is "right to apply". In view of what
has been stated by this Court, Article 137 is
clearly applicable
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hubli, where the question was whether article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 , applied to an application made to the labour ... made in the Limitation Act, 1963 , the scope and ambit of article 137 remained the same and it was not possible to hold "that
observed as under:
"22. The conclusion we reach is that Article 137 of 1963 Limitation
Act will apply to any petition or application filed ... Municipal Council case (AIR 1969
SC 1335) (supra) and hold that Article 137 of 1963 Limitation Act is
not confined to applications contemplated
Though reference has been made to Section 27 Article 64 and Article 137 of the Limitation Act on behalf of 61 persons by Mr. Kanabar ... possession is being sought. Therefore Article 64 of the Limitation Act cannot have any play. Similarly, Article 137 under the Schedule to the Limitation
Copyright Board dated 7th September, 2001, whereby it is held that Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to the application filed ... Copyright Board is a Tribunal and a quasi-judicial authority. Therefore, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has no application to any petition
