with the grant of compensation under the Telegraph Act , the residuary Article 137 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 , which prescribes a period ... Court under any law, the period of limitation prescribed under Article 137 would be attracted, which is 3 years and if an application was filed
earlier articles, and, consequently, in interpreting this article, regard must be bad to be provisions contained in all the earlier articles. The other articles ... clearly stated following its earlier decisions that Article 181 of the Limitation Act 1908 and Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applied only
Succession Act being a self-contained code, the provisions contained under Article 137 of the Limitation Act has no application and therefore the conclusion reached ... Whether the petition filed seeking probate is barred by limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act ?
4. Whether the petition filed seeking issue
would apply. This article is a residuary article. It would apply only if there is no other article applicable to the nature of the claim ... given to article 181 of the 1908 Limitation Act , on the principle of ejusdem generis is not applicable with regard to article 137
Limitation Act . Since no Article expressly prescribed the limitation to make such application, the residuary article under Article 137 of the Schedule to the Limitation ... filed under Section 31 of the Act is Article 112 or Article 136 and not Article 137. There is no merit in this contention
Section 263 of the Act is not barred by limitation against Article 137 of the Limitation Act has no application to the said proceeding under ... Learned Senior counsel Sri. Tarakaram for the appellant strenuously contended that Article 137 of the Limitation Act has no application to a proceeding under Section
proceedings under Section 21 of the Act. If so, whether Article 137 or Article 67 applies to a petition filed for eviction of a tenant ... provisions of the Limitation Act are attracted, it is Article 67 and not Article 137 would apply as held by the Supreme Court
clearly barred
9
by limitation in view of Article 137 of the Limitation Act .
He also contended that, in view of the provisions of
Section ... Limitation Act was applicable and not
Article 136. According to the respondents,
21
Article 137 of the Limitation Act was
applicable and as per that
proceedings initiated by the petitioner-corporation were barred by limitation as Article 137 of the Limitation Act is applicable to the claim made under Section ... period of limitation applicable is three years as provided under Article 137. Learned counsel for the appellant has thus very vehemently contended that in view
under Article
55 has to be reckoned; thus in the fact matrix of this
case there is no scope for invoking residuary Article 137 ... given to Article 181 of the 1908 Limitation Act on the
principle of ejusdem generis is not applicable with regard
to Article 137
