present case the plaintiffs'
suit is governed by article 124 or article 141 of the
Limitation Act ? If article 141 is the appropriate article ... learned Judges that the proper article to be applied in this
case is article 124 and not article 141. There could be no
doubt that
part of the plaintiff it was urged that Article 141 of the Indian Limitation Act applied, and that as under that Article in a suit ... respect of the malikana is not statute barred under Article 120.
(5) Article 141 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, admittedly applies to the claim
specially provided for, and that the article applicable to a suit for possession of immovable property was Article 141 and that for movables was Article ... suppose that the legislature intervened and by enacting Article 142 in 1871 and Article 141 in 1877 and 1908 (in the Limitation Acts) nullified
this purpose the suit described in Article 148 also, are Articles 134 to 144 and Article 148. Omitting Article 144 from consideration, on the ground ... under the other articles except in the case of a suit under Article 148 , when the result of applying Article 141 may be even
unnecessary to discuss the effect of Article 142 of Act No. IX of 1871 and Article 141 of No. XV of 1877, In Hari Nath ... passed), the effect of Article 142 in the schedule to Act No. IX of 1871 and of Article 141 in the schedule
this purpose, the suit described in Article 148 alsoare ArticleS 134 to 144 and Article 148. Omitting Article 144 from consideration on the ground that ... other article, except in the case of a suit under Article 148 when the result of applying Article 141 may be even to cut down
Article i.e. Article 65 in the shape of Clauses (a), (b) and (c), the legislature has specifically retained the provisions of Articles 140 , 141 ... also found that explanation (b) to Article 65 of the New Act is referrable to Article 141 of the old Act. It has been further
Article 141 applies or whether the appropriate Article is Article 142 , which is the Article governing claims to possession of immovable property when plaintiff ... pointed cut that there was no Article in the Limitation Act then in force corresponding to Article 141 of the Act of 1908, a corresponding
terms negatived the contention that Article 144 , Limitation Act was applicable to the facts of that case. Article 141 was the one which specially provided ... Lordships held that Article 144 had no application to the facts of the case and the plain words of Article 141 were sufficient to bring
presented
have the force of law as mandated under Article 141 of the
Constitution of India, and so much so, when conflicting views
are expressed ... Court whether that decision is a 'law
declared' under Article 141 of the Constitution of India. In
State of U.P. and another
