Sharda Kumari vs The State Of Rajasthan on 9 August, 2018
that turned out to be of far-reaching
implications related to Article 275 of the Constitution. In
it, the Commission expressed the view that grants
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 591 (1.25 seconds)Jaya Bhardwaj vs State Of Rajasthan on 20 August, 2018
that turned out to be of far-reaching
implications related to Article 275 of the Constitution. In
it, the Commission expressed the view that grants
Durga Meena vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 August, 2018
that turned out to be of far-reaching
implications related to Article 275 of the Constitution. In
it, the Commission expressed the view that grants
Mamta Kumari Meghwal vs State Of Rajasthan on 20 August, 2018
that turned out to be of far-reaching
implications related to Article 275 of the Constitution. In
it, the Commission expressed the view that grants
Shanti Lal Kalal vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 January, 2026
administration.
11.4.This Court accordingly holds that the true effect of Article
243-ZC is not prohibition but protection, protection of Scheduled
Areas from ... Advisory Council, and the protective and
developmental commitments flowing from Articles 46 and 275(1) ,
including those operationalised through the Tribal Sub-Plan,
continue
Santosh Devi vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 January, 2026
administration.
11.4.This Court accordingly holds that the true effect of Article
243-ZC is not prohibition but protection, protection of Scheduled
Areas from ... Advisory Council, and the protective and
developmental commitments flowing from Articles 46 and 275(1) ,
including those operationalised through the Tribal Sub-Plan,
continue
Ankit Kumar Meena vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 January, 2026
administration.
11.4.This Court accordingly holds that the true effect of Article
243-ZC is not prohibition but protection, protection of Scheduled
Areas from ... Advisory Council, and the protective and
developmental commitments flowing from Articles 46 and 275(1) ,
including those operationalised through the Tribal Sub-Plan,
continue
Ankit Kumar Meena vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 January, 2026
administration.
11.4.This Court accordingly holds that the true effect of Article
243-ZC is not prohibition but protection, protection of Scheduled
Areas from ... Advisory Council, and the protective and
developmental commitments flowing from Articles 46 and 275(1) ,
including those operationalised through the Tribal Sub-Plan,
continue
Rakam Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 January, 2026
administration.
11.4.This Court accordingly holds that the true effect of Article
243-ZC is not prohibition but protection, protection of Scheduled
Areas from ... Advisory Council, and the protective and
developmental commitments flowing from Articles 46 and 275(1) ,
including those operationalised through the Tribal Sub-Plan,
continue
Gram Panchayat Balicha vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 January, 2026
administration.
11.4.This Court accordingly holds that the true effect of Article
243-ZC is not prohibition but protection, protection of Scheduled
Areas from ... Advisory Council, and the protective and
developmental commitments flowing from Articles 46 and 275(1) ,
including those operationalised through the Tribal Sub-Plan,
continue