Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 99 (0.80 seconds)

Barun Kumar vs M/O Defence on 18 May, 2023

Item No. 43 (C-3) O.A. No. 282/2020 instructions, the statutory rules framed under Article 309 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly ... Item No. 43 (C-3) O.A. No. 282/2020 13. The respondents did not act upon the Central Government Pay Commission
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Kumar vs Union Of India on 30 May, 2011

Memorandum of Charge dated 12.06.2007 was issued, by which the following Article of Charge was communicated to him: That the said Shri Raj Kumar, while ... Industry (Room Nos. 156, 117-A, 275, 480, 123-B, 124-C, 282 and 184) inasmuch as the name of the contractor to whom
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Kumar vs M/O Commerce on 2 June, 2016

Memorandum dated 11.10.2011 2 OA No.4672/2014 (Annexure-A), statement of Articles of Charge (Annexure-I) and imputation of misconduct (Annexure ... this Tribunal, the fresh Articles of Charge (Annexure-I) and the Statement of Imputation of Misconduct in support of the Article of Charge (Annexure
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next