approved as supplementary, additional or excess grants ( Article 205 ).
He also referred to Article 282 of the Constitution of India, which
empowers the State Government ... grant for any purpose. Article
282 reads as under:
"282. Expenditure defrayable by the Union or a State out of its
revenues The Union
Section 240 (3) of the
Government of India Act, 1935. Article 311 was article
282-B of the draft Constitution of India and the draft ... debate
centred upon the proviso to clause (2) of the draft Article
282-B, whihs is now the second proviso to Article 311.
Further
whereas the prescribed period of limitation for raising the arbitration
proceedings under Article 137 of the Limitation Act is three years. In
this regard ... Electricity Board, Trivandrum Vs. T.P.Kunhaliumma , AIR 1977 SC
282, where Article 137 of the Limitation Act has been considered and
it is held
held that the residuary clause of Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 did not apply to the proceedings before the Labour Court ... Board Trivendrum v. T. P. Kunhaliumma , AIR 1977 SC 282, it was held that " Article 137 will apply to any petition or application filed
upon Kerala State Electricity Board v. T.P. Kunhaliumma , AIR 1977 SC 282, to contend that the limitation under these circumstances would be three years ... Kunhaliumma 's case, AIR 1977 SC 282, held that Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies to any petition or application filed under
Section 43 of the Act, the period of limitation
contemplated under Article 137 of the schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963
is applicable ... Amsom and Besom, Kerala AIR 1977 SC 282, it is now well settled that
Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 would apply
period of three years as prescribed under Article 137 should be treated as barred by limitation.
19. Article 137 embodies a residuary clause. It contemplates ... Kunhallumma, A.I.R. 1977 S.C. 282, it was inter alia held that the provisions of Article 137 are not restricted to the applications
State of Haryana , 1995(2) R.S.J. 282 that in view of Article 16 of the Constitution of India
Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri
Shirur Mutt , reported in AIR 1954 SC 282, their Lordships of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court have held that ... that
religion itself. Their Lordships have further held that the language of
Articles 25 and 26 is sufficiently clear to enable the Court to determine
Supreme Court as also the other High Courts on the relevance of Article
25 in protecting professed beliefs and faiths of the citizens ... 282, the
Hon'ble Supreme Court observed as under :-
"14. We now come to Article 25 which, as its language
indicates, secures
