Dr. Shri Harish vs Union Of India on 19 February, 2024
Article 282 of the Constitution of India. To buttress this submission, reference
was made to the decisions in Bhim Singh v. Union of India
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 3303 (1.66 seconds)Dr. Shri Harish vs Union Of India on 19 February, 2024
benefit of private persons and it is contrary to
Article 282 of the Constitution of India. To buttress this submission, reference
was made
Naveed Abdul Saeed Mulla vs The State Of Maharashtra Chief Minister ... on 5 August, 2024
statute was on the
principal ground that it was violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Rejecting the challenge, the Constitution Bench observed that laws ... supra) finally concluded that in view of the provisions
contained in Article 282 of the Constitution of India, a very wide
discretion is available
R Padmaja Rani vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 11 September, 2024
that the High Court while
exercising Hy pawer under Article 226 the interes? of frstice requires thad
wiy undeserved or anfeir advantage gained by @ party ... Heht of drat law and in view
of ike power under Article 282ยข7} af the Consiitution this Court, while
exercising Hs jurisdictian would
Janhit Manch And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors on 29 January, 2024
thus submitted that the
same fell squarely within the provisions of Article 282 of the
Constitution of India and were not in any manner ... secular activities was not violation of Article 27 of the
Constitution of India and was permissible under Article 282 of the
Constitution of India. Basis
Janhit Manch And Ors vs Union Of India , Through The Secretaries ... on 29 January, 2024
thus submitted that the
same fell squarely within the provisions of Article 282 of the
Constitution of India and were not in any manner ... secular activities was not violation of Article 27 of the
Constitution of India and was permissible under Article 282 of the
Constitution of India. Basis
Bnp Paribas, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 13 May, 2024
branch (service agent) to the tune of Rs 40.78 10,733/ under Article 13
of the India-France Tax Treaty. We find that the Tribunal ... assessee to
Singapore Branch to the tune of Rs 325,963,282/- under Article
13 of the India-France treaty. We find that while deciding
Bnp Paribas, Mumbai vs Acit (It), Circle 1(3)(1), Mumbai on 21 June, 2024
branch (service agent) to the tune of Rs 40.78 10,733/ under Article 13
of the India-France Tax Treaty. We find that the Tribunal ... assessee to Singapore Branch to the tune of Rs
325,963,282/- under Article 13 of the India-France treaty. We find that while
deciding
Central Organisation For Railway ... vs M/S Eci Spic Smo Mcml (Jv) A Joint Venture ... on 8 November, 2024
Central Organisation For Railway ... vs M/S Eci Spic Smo Mcml (Jv) A Joint Venture
Reserved On: 11.11.2024 vs State Of H.P on 21 November, 2024
Reserved On: 11.11.2024 vs State Of H.P on 21 November, 2024
Author: Vivek Singh