under Article 166 and not by expressing it to have been made "on behalf of the Governor" as required under Article 299 ... Government in exercise of the executive powers envisaged under Article 298 read with Article 299(1) of the Constitution.
34. Having come to the conclusion
agreement entered into by them was not in conformity with Article 299(1) of the Constitution of India and therefore, the plaintiffs were not entitled ... suit was liable to be dismissed as the provisions of Article 299(1) of the Constitution had not been complied with It accordingly dismissed
called acceptance under Ext. A-4 is contrary to Article 299(1) of the Constitution;
(ii) before a valid contract could come into existence ... question is whether the contract under consideration satisfies the requirements of Article 299(1) of the Constitution.
17. It would be seen that a contract
made
in exercise of Executive Power as envisaged
under Article 299 of Constitution of India.
iii) The contract is a statutory contract. The
commissioner ... contract and non-statutory contract, In
respect of non-statutory aspects, Article 299
27 W.A.4066/2011 A/W
W.A.4739
State Legislature may make laws, be subject to legislation by Parliament.
Article 299. (1) All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power ... feel that some reasonable meaning must be attached to Article 299(1). We do not think the provisions were inserted for the sake of mere
present case
since it involved a Government contract as contemplated
under Article 299(1) of the Constitution of India which
factor weighed with the Court ... article useless, for then a person having
a contract with Government which was
not executed at all in the manner
provided in Article 299
Public Works Department as an authorised officer of respondent 1 under Article 299(1) of the Constitution of India, for and on behalf of Governor
award, it
was not necessary to comply with the
provisions of Article 299 of the
Constitution. An agreement between the
parties need not furthermore
accepted the same and executed the agreement as contemplated under Article 299 of the Constitution of India. Sarvashree H.S. Nagendra and M. Ramakrishna
petitioners that the resolution of the State Legislature passed in terms of Article 252 of the Constitution denuded the competence of the State Legislature ... distinct and separate. The reliance of the petitioners upon Articles 294 and 299 of the Constitution has been seriously contested and it is pointed
