Section 23 in The Lokpal And Lokayuktas Act, 2013 [Entire Act]
generality of the provisions contained in article 311 and sub-clause (c) of clause (3) of article 320 of the Constitution
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 631 (1.05 seconds)Union Of India & Ors vs R.P.Singh on 22 May, 2014
noted, in the said case, interpretation placed by this
Court under Article 320(3)(c) of the Constitution in State of U.P.
v. Manbodhan ... case of Srivastava (supra) we hold that the
provisions of Article 320(3)(c) of the Constitution of India are
not mandatory and they
Manohar Lal Sharma Advocate vs The Principal Secretary, Prime ... on 13 August, 2014
Manohar Lal Sharma Advocate vs The Principal Secretary, Prime ... on 13 August, 2014
Author: Badar
Shri S.K. Babbar vs Union Of India Through on 21 April, 2014
Supreme Court also took note of the earlier decisions that Article 320(3)(c) of the Constitution are not mandatory, but went ahead to hold ... expression 'may' in sub-Article 3 of Article 320 of the Constitution of India. Opinions by UPSC on disciplinary matters are not binding
N Gopalaswami & Ors vs The Union Of India & Anr on 13 August, 2014
N Gopalaswami & Ors vs The Union Of India & Anr on 13 August, 2014
Union Of India vs R.P.Singh on 22 May, 2014
noted, in the said case, interpretation placed by this Court
under Article 320(3)(c) of the Constitution in State ... case of Srivastava (supra) we hold that
the provisions of Article 320(3)(c) of the Constitution of
India are not mandatory and they
Mithilesh Kumar Verma vs Forest And Environment on 15 May, 2014
consulting the Public Service
Commission and thus, in complete violation of Article 320 (3) (a)
of the Constitution of India and also for seeking ... Appeal) Rules, 1930 however, in
complete violation of provision under Article 320 of the
Constitution of India, the Resolution dated 28.09.2012 has been
issued
The Union Of India vs The Registrar on 17 July, 2014
Commission (UPSC).
8. The UPSC would, for its part, point to Article 320 of the
Constitution of India, arguing that recruitments for the post ... UPSC would strenuously argue based on the mandate of
Article 320 of the Constitution of India. They submit that any appointments
made without reference
Shri Vijay Singh vs Union Of India on 16 October, 2014
matter including consultation with the UPSC as provided under Article 320(3)(c ) of the Constitution which says that on all disciplinary matters affecting ... necessary. While constitutional safeguards under Article 311 of the Constitution are available to every person, the safeguard in Article 320(3)( c) is one capable
Shri B.P.Mahaur vs Union Of India Through on 22 July, 2014
this Court in Srivastava, we hold that the provisions of Article 320(3)(c) of the Constitution of India are not mandatory and they ... Narulas case and Patels case finally held that
Although Article 320(3)(c) is not mandatory, if authorities do consult UPSC and rely