Articles 315 and 320 deal with the appointment of a Public Service Commission for a State and the functions of that Commission. Article 321 then ... Article 12 , while in Article 308 " local authority" is not included. Reference may also be made to Article 321 which also occurs
Articles 320 and 311 of the Constitution and would Dot assume any function which is not authorised by either of these two Articles ... Government is thus answerable to the House for any departure vide Article 321 of the Constitution. It does not, however, clothe the recommendee with
State Of Punjab vs Central Administrative Tribunal Chd ... on 6 November, 2020
Author: Jaswant Singh
conduct examinations for appointment to the services is concerned.
Referring to Article 321 , he submits that the Constitution rather
provides for extension of the functions ... Public Service Commissions". Articles 320 and
323 lay down the several duties of a Public Service
Commission. Article 321 envisages such "additional
functions
extent,
that the word "shall" which occurs in Article 320 (3) of the Constitution of
India, thus is to be not construed ... Public
Service Commissions." Articles 320 and 323 lay down the several
duties of a Public Service Commission. Article 321 envisages such "
additional functions
favour of women is not whittled down in any manner by Article 16 of the Constitution.
23. It cannot be denied that there are patent ... Yusuf Abdul Aziz v. State of Bombay, AIR 1954 SC 321, however, held that Article 14 is general and is required to be read with
Amarbir Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 31 May, 2013
Author: Paramjeet Singh
equality before law guaranteed by Article 14 and to the prohibition of discrimination guaranteed by Article 15(1). The three provisions form part ... ambit of Clause (3) of Article 15. In Yusuf Abdul Aziz v. State of Bombay, AIR 1964 SC 321, the validity of Section
decision cannot be said to affect the
fundamental rights of citizens under Article 19 (1).
"39 .........Just as an order passed by the Court ... violated Article 14. It may incidentally be pointed
out that the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in
(1944) 321
Appeal No.58-SB of 2001 &
Crl. Appeal No.321-SB of 2001
that presumption, either during the course of cross-examination ... ibid reads as under :-
"Presumption from possession of illicit articles:- In
trials under this Act, it may be presumed, unless and
until the contrary
