Tapan Kumar Mandal vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 3 November, 2014
Tapan Kumar Mandal vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 3 November, 2014
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 496 (1.23 seconds)Surajmal And Ors. vs The State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 12 April, 1973
when a party comes to this Court under Article 32 from one applicable to applications under Article 226. There is a public policy behind all statutes ... Halsbury's Laws of England (Third Edition Vol. 24) Article 330 at Page 181:
"The Courts have expressed at least three different reasons
State Of U.P.Through ... vs Ist Additional District Judge Lucknow & ... on 21 February, 2013
State Of U.P.Through ... vs Ist Additional District Judge Lucknow & ... on 21 February
Purshotam Lal And Ors. vs The State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 11 February, 1972
when a patty comes to this Court under Article 32 from one applicable to applications under Article 226. There is a public policy behind all statutes ... Halsbury's Laws of England (Third Edition Vol. 24) Article 330 at page 181:
The Courts have expressed at least three different reasons supporting
Rama K. Kunder vs The 15Th Land Tribunal, Udupi Taluk And ... on 18 February, 1998
from Halsbury's Laws of England (Third Edition, Vol. 24, Article 330 ) supporting the public policy behind the statute of limitations.-
"The Courts
For The vs Shree Dnyaneshwar on 19 September, 2018
when a party comes to this
Court under Article 32 from one applicable to applications under Article
226. There is a public policy behind all statutes ... Halsbury's Laws of England (Third Edition Vol. 24), Article
330 at Page 181
'The Courts have expressed at least three different reasons
Standing Conference Of Public ... vs Bses Rajdhani Power Limited & Ors. on 16 January, 2013
under in Halsbury‟s
Law of England (Third Edition, Vol 24), Article 330 at p. 18:
"The courts have expressed at least three different ... Sales Tax
Act and impugned the order of forfeiture as violative of Article 19(1)(f) and 365 of
the Constitution. The writ petition having
P.T. Munichikkanna Reddy & Ors vs Revamma And Ors on 24 April, 2007
Banto and Others [(2005) 8 SCC 330] in that
context held:
"29. In terms of Article 65 the starting point
of limitation does ... Singh v. Banto and Others [(2005) 8 SCC 330] stating:
"29. In terms of Article 65 the starting point
of limitation does not commence
Hemaji Waghaji Jat vs Bhikhabhai Khengarbhai Harijan & Ors on 23 September, 2008
Saroop Singh v. Banto (2005) 8 SCC 330 this Court
observed:
"29. In terms of Article 65 the starting point of
limitation does
Smt. Chhutbai And Anr. vs Madanlal And Anr. on 5 May, 1989
MADHYA PRADESH 330, 1989 MPRCJ 229
JUDGMENT
S.K. Dubey, J.
1. This is a petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution