benefit under Article 16(4) or 15(4); those, among
them, identified by a Commission Appointed by the
President under Article 340 of the Constitution ... separate class. The
learned minority Judge was not right in holding
that Article 14 was violated.
20. As regards the preparation of separate list
benefit under Article 16(4) or 15(4); those, among
them, identified by a Commission Appointed by the
President under Article 340 of the Constitution ... separate class. The
learned minority Judge was not right in holding
that Article 14 was violated.
20. As regards the preparation of separate list
benefit under Article 16(4) or 15(4); those, among
them, identified by a Commission Appointed by the
President under Article 340 of the Constitution ... separate class. The
learned minority Judge was not right in holding
that Article 14 was violated.
20. As regards the preparation of separate list
benefit under Article 16(4) or 15(4); those, among
them, identified by a Commission Appointed by the
President under Article 340 of the Constitution ... separate class. The
learned minority Judge was not right in holding
that Article 14 was violated.
20. As regards the preparation of separate list
benefit under Article 16(4) or 15(4); those, among
them, identified by a Commission Appointed by the
President under Article 340 of the Constitution ... separate class. The
learned minority Judge was not right in holding
that Article 14 was violated.
20. As regards the preparation of separate list
benefit under Article 16(4) or 15(4); those, among
them, identified by a Commission Appointed by the
President under Article 340 of the Constitution ... separate class. The
learned minority Judge was not right in holding
that Article 14 was violated.
20. As regards the preparation of separate list
benefit under Article 16(4) or 15(4); those, among
them, identified by a Commission Appointed by the
President under Article 340 of the Constitution ... separate class. The
learned minority Judge was not right in holding
that Article 14 was violated.
20. As regards the preparation of separate list
benefit under Article 16(4) or 15(4); those, among
them, identified by a Commission Appointed by the
President under Article 340 of the Constitution ... separate class. The
learned minority Judge was not right in holding
that Article 14 was violated.
20. As regards the preparation of separate list
benefit under Article 16(4) or 15(4); those, among
them, identified by a Commission Appointed by the
President under Article 340 of the Constitution ... separate class. The
learned minority Judge was not right in holding
that Article 14 was violated.
20. As regards the preparation of separate list
benefit under Article 16(4) or 15(4); those, among
them, identified by a Commission Appointed by the
President under Article 340 of the Constitution ... separate class. The
learned minority Judge was not right in holding
that Article 14 was violated.
20. As regards the preparation of separate list
