Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 285 (1.60 seconds)

Unknown vs Bikram Singh on 17 May, 2016

40)" 14. In State of Maharashtra v. Digambar , (1995) 4 SCC 683, while dealing with exercise of power of the High Court under Article ... appoint him contrary to the recruitment rules framed under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India which are statutory in nature is clearly
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Unknown vs Bikram Singh on 17 May, 2016

40)" 14. In State of Maharashtra v. Digambar , (1995) 4 SCC 683, while dealing with exercise of power of the High Court under Article ... appoint him contrary to the recruitment rules framed under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India which are statutory in nature is clearly
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Unknown vs Bikram Singh on 17 May, 2016

40)" 14. In State of Maharashtra v. Digambar , (1995) 4 SCC 683, while dealing with exercise of power of the High Court under Article ... appoint him contrary to the recruitment rules framed under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India which are statutory in nature is clearly
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Unknown vs Bikram Singh on 17 May, 2016

40)" 14. In State of Maharashtra v. Digambar , (1995) 4 SCC 683, while dealing with exercise of power of the High Court under Article ... appoint him contrary to the recruitment rules framed under proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India which are statutory in nature is clearly
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next