Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 95 (1.15 seconds)

Pinki Devi vs Govt. Of Nctd on 14 January, 2026

bound to fall. Rightly so, the computer by using its Artificial Intelligence did not proceed further to evaluate the answer sheet of the applicant once ... bound to fall. Rightly so, the computer by using its artificial intelligence did not proceed further to evaluate the answer sheet of the applicant
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anit Mann vs Govt. Of Nctd on 8 August, 2024

applicant which cannot be brushed below the carpet. The computer using Artificial Intelligence thus rightly rejected the candidature of the applicant. Moreover, this case ... bound to fall. Rightly so, the computer by using its Artificial Intelligence did not proceed further to evaluate the answer sheet of the applicant once
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Alok Kumar vs Union Of India on 22 July, 2014

submitted that the applicants have desperately tried to create an artificial comparison with respect to the nature of duties being performed by the deputationists ... were from combatized force/Central Police Force and on deputation to the Intelligence Bureau, which case law could not be applied to the instant case
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next