Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1865 (1.21 seconds)

M/S Greenfiled Overseas (Proprietor – ... vs Anil Goel (Liquidator Of Loha Ispaat) on 25 July, 2025

Performing Asset (NPA) in September 2014 by consortium lenders, suggesting that the impugned transactions were undertaken to divert assets beyond the reach of creditors, particularly ... transactions as those where the value received is significantly less than the asset's market value. The impugned transactions meet this criterion, with
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Arihant International (Proprietor ... vs Anil Goel (Liquidator Of Loha Ispaat) on 25 July, 2025

Performing Asset (NPA) in September 2014 by consortium lenders, suggesting that the impugned transactions were undertaken to divert assets beyond the reach of creditors, particularly ... transactions as those where the value received is significantly less than the asset's market value. The impugned transactions meet this criterion, with
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Marque Global (Proprietor – Rahul ... vs Anil Goel (Liquidator Of Loha Ispaat) on 25 July, 2025

Performing Asset (NPA) in September 2014 by consortium lenders, suggesting that the impugned transactions were undertaken to divert assets beyond the reach of creditors, particularly ... transactions as those where the value received is significantly less than the asset's market value. The impugned transactions meet this criterion, with
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Marque Global (Proprietor – Rahul ... vs Anil Goel (Liquidator Of Loha Ispaat) on 25 July, 2025

Performing Asset (NPA) in September 2014 by consortium lenders, suggesting that the impugned transactions were undertaken to divert assets beyond the reach of creditors, particularly ... transactions as those where the value received is significantly less than the asset's market value. The impugned transactions meet this criterion, with
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Greenfiled Overseas (Proprietor – ... vs Anil Goel (Liquidator Of Loha Ispaat) on 25 July, 2025

Performing Asset (NPA) in September 2014 by consortium lenders, suggesting that the impugned transactions were undertaken to divert assets beyond the reach of creditors, particularly ... transactions as those where the value received is significantly less than the asset's market value. The impugned transactions meet this criterion, with
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Greenfiled Overseas (Proprietor – ... vs Anil Goel (Liquidator Of Loha Ispaat) on 25 July, 2025

Performing Asset (NPA) in September 2014 by consortium lenders, suggesting that the impugned transactions were undertaken to divert assets beyond the reach of creditors, particularly ... transactions as those where the value received is significantly less than the asset's market value. The impugned transactions meet this criterion, with
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Arihant International (Proprietor ... vs Anil Goel (Liquidator Of Loha Ispaat) on 25 July, 2025

Performing Asset (NPA) in September 2014 by consortium lenders, suggesting that the impugned transactions were undertaken to divert assets beyond the reach of creditors, particularly ... transactions as those where the value received is significantly less than the asset's market value. The impugned transactions meet this criterion, with
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Arihant International (Proprietor ... vs Anil Goel (Liquidator Of Loha Ispaat) on 25 July, 2025

Performing Asset (NPA) in September 2014 by consortium lenders, suggesting that the impugned transactions were undertaken to divert assets beyond the reach of creditors, particularly ... transactions as those where the value received is significantly less than the asset's market value. The impugned transactions meet this criterion, with
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next