relevant documents before arriving the
conclusion that the appellants possess disproportionate assets beyond their known
source of income worth
suspecting conspiracy to acquire and possess
disproportionate assets beyond the known source of income of the
public servant.
(ii)According to the First Information Report ... judis.nic.in
14
reason why the value of these assets and other assets as shown by
the prosecution has to be accepted.
9.Therefore
proof of assets possessed by the public servant. When the prosecution proves that the public servant possesses assets disproportionate to his known sources of income ... servant is able to account for the excess of assets. If one possesses assets beyond his legitimate means, it goes with- out saying that
Minister, A2 to A4 abated A1 to accumulate assets beyond the known source of
income and thereby, committed an offence punishable under Section ... expenditure and the value of assets in hand at the
end of check period, the trial Court concluded that assets in hand
assets mentioned by the prosecution in Annexure-V as the assets acquired during the check period, by A1 and A2 are not been proved beyond ... Annexure V+ Annexure VI]
16. Thus, the disproportionality of assets and pecuniary resource are beyond the known sources and duly attracts offence under Section
wife had not disclosed in his assets and liability statements about the possession of 90 sovereign jewels.
13. The prosecution has well established through ... documents the charge against the accused regarding his possession of disproportionate assets beyond the known source of income. The trial Court has properly appreciated
wife had not disclosed in his assets and liability statements about the possession of 90 sovereign jewels.
13. The prosecution has well established through ... documents the charge against the accused regarding his possession of disproportionate assets beyond the known source of income. The trial Court has properly appreciated
Arbuthnot and Co's liabilities at Rs.27 million and its assets at only Rs.7 = million! The firm had 2,300 operating accounts ... over Rs 25 million. With the assets being described as being only on paper and beyond all belief, worthless, which crumble to dust when touched
disproportionate assets, it is for the prosecution to prove how the accused person is holding asset in his name and others name beyond legally known
difference amount between their alleged income during the check period and the assets plus expenditure during the check period. The Trial court after due consideration ... conclusion that the appellants are guilty of holding disproportionate assert beyond their known source of income?
15. The undisputed facts in this case is that