trademark. However, the plaintiff's father was continuously using the same
trademark and he has also assigned the trademark right in favour ... year 2008, the trademark has been registered. Section 54 of the
Trademark Act deals with right of assignment by registered user. The registered
user
trademark 'Super Power''
detergent cake dated 29.07.2002, Ex.P15 is the photocopy of
Trademark Registration Certificate of plaintiff's trademark ... trademark journal dated
01.05.2005, Ex.P36 is the photocopy of Advertisement in
trademark journal dated 01.05.2005, Ex.P37 is the photocopy of
trademark
plaintiff's father has not renewed the said
trademark. The plaintiff has assigned the mark in favour of the plaintiff. The
plaintiff started ... alleged
assignment deed dated 06.12.2015 is created for the purpose of the suit. The
application filed for registration of the trademark is also pending before
identical trademark 060 BRAND label and trademark MUBARAK with
colour scheme, getup, layout which are almost identical to plaintiff's
registered trademarks ... identical/deceptively similar
trademarks 060 BRAND label, RASAGULLA label and MUBARAK label or any
trademark similar to plaintiff's trademarks 360 BRAND label, THILLANA
other person from infringing the trademark by using
the identical/similar mark to Plaintiff’s trademarks “VV
NATIONAL”, “ , & ” , or any other
word/words/logo ... other person from infringing the trademark by using
the identical/similar mark to Plaintiff’s trademarks “VV
NATIONAL”, “ , & ” , or any other
word/words/logo
defendant, by themselves, their directors, partners, legal
representatives, successors in business, assigns, servants, agents,
transporters, distributors, printers, stockists, wholesalers, dealers,
retailers, advertisers ... claiming through or under them
from infringing plaintiff's registered trademark SILVER FOAM XXX
label/pouch by manufacturing, distributing, marketing, selling,
offering for sale
trademark whcih is almost
identical/deceptively similar to the plaintiff's TAIYO
trademark amounting to infringement of the plaintiff's
registered trademark TAIYO ... HELLO PETS trademark which is deceptively
similar to the plaintiff’s TAIYO trademark amounting to
infringement of the plaintiff’s registered trademark TAIYO
dealing with the trademark Sakthivel Builders logo or
the SB logo amounting to infringement of the 1st plaintiff's registered
trademark AH logo under ... Class 37 or any mark
similar to 1st plaintiff's registered trademark or in any other manner
whatsoever;
(b) A permanent injunction restraining
business, servants, agents, distributors, dealers, stockists,
shop keepers, wholesalers, retailers, representatives, assigns and all
other persons claiming through or under them from infringing ... shop
keepers, wholesalers, retailers, representatives, assigns and all other
persons claiming through or under them from infringing the registered
trademark/device of distorted triangles
plaintiff got registered the trademark “ANAND” and
became the registered proprietor of the said trademark. The said
registrations are valid & subsisting and the same ... period of seven years from 23.02.2003. The plaintiff has never assigned
or licensed the Trademark “ANAND” in favour of any person at any time
