driving a half body truck no. HR-46A-3089 at very
high speed on wrong side and hit against TSR bearing no.
HR-10PA ... truck
coming from the side of Ramdev Marg at a very high speed from
the wrong side and hit the TSR. He further deposed that
Delhi
8 Cheque return memo dated 01.05.2015 Ex. CW1/2D
9 Speed postal receipt dated 20.05.2015 Ex. CW1/4A
10 Speed postal receipt ... Legal notice dated 20.05.2015 Ex. CW1/3A
12 Speed postal receipt dated 20.05.2015 Ex. CW1/4C
13 Speed postal receipt dated
Santro Car bearing number 3093 came
from NOIDA side at very high speed, being driven in rash
and negligent manner, and it hit her because ... received some injuries.
The defence that he took was:
i. That the speed of his vehicle was so slow that the
pedestrians were moving faster
driving
the offending bus in rash and negligent and at fast speed.
22. Let us first examine as to what amounts to rashness or negligence ... However, the mere fact that accused was driving
vehicle at high speed may not attract provision of Section 279 IPC. For speed of
a vehicle
driving the vehicle rashly and
negligently vis-a-vis at a high speed, remained unchallenged.
The State had succeeded to prove all the requirements ... appellant was driving maruti van rashly and negligently and
at a high speed. Lastly, trial court declined to accept
appellant's plea that
they left for
Airport. The accused was driving the taxi at high speed in a rash and
negligent manner. At around ... offending vehicle
in a rash and negligent manner and at high speed.
10. In his crossexamination, PW4 HC Raveendran admitted that
State Vs. Ganesh
coming from the side of Hauz
Qazi in fast speed in "no entry" zone. All of a sudden, he
had turned the vehicle ... accused,
came from the side of Hauz Qazi at fast speed in "no entry
zone". The accused negligently all of a sudden turned
vehicle in a
very rash and negligent manner and in a high speed upon which he
repeatedly requested the accused to not to driver ... that the accused was driving in rash and
negligent manner at high speed without taking proper care and
without giving any heed to his warning
prosecuted vide challan no.357736 v/s 112/183M.V.Act for
speeding at 52 km per hour where as permissible limit ... ground of challan u/s 66/192. he further deposed that the speed
governer was defective and management was informed many time
but they asked
Petitioner.
There is no evidence placed on record to show the speed of
the vehicle or the manner in which it was being driven ... place
is a busy road and vehicles are normally at a good speed. The accident had
taken place at 1.30 p.m which
