Calcutta
354(DB) held that if a party fails to attend the arbitration
hearing on the due date and time, the arbitrator is at liberty ... petitioner there was no evidence that the
petitioner would not attend the arbitration proceedings. On the
other hand, the petitioner had in fact, attended
Calcutta
354(DB) held that if a party fails to attend the arbitration
hearing on the due date and time, the arbitrator is at liberty ... petitioner there was no evidence that the
petitioner would not attend the arbitration proceedings. On the
other hand, the petitioner had in fact, attended
Calcutta
354(DB) held that if a party fails to attend the arbitration
hearing on the due date and time, the arbitrator is at liberty ... petitioner there was no evidence that the
petitioner would not attend the arbitration proceedings. On the
other hand, the petitioner had in fact, attended
Calcutta
354(DB) held that if a party fails to attend the arbitration
hearing on the due date and time, the arbitrator is at liberty ... petitioner there was no evidence that the
petitioner would not attend the arbitration proceedings. On the
other hand, the petitioner had in fact, attended
Calcutta
354(DB) held that if a party fails to attend the arbitration
hearing on the due date and time, the arbitrator is at liberty ... petitioner there was no evidence that the
petitioner would not attend the arbitration proceedings. On the
other hand, the petitioner had in fact, attended
Calcutta
354(DB) held that if a party fails to attend the arbitration
hearing on the due date and time, the arbitrator is at liberty ... petitioner there was no evidence that the
petitioner would not attend the arbitration proceedings. On the
other hand, the petitioner had in fact, attended
Calcutta
354(DB) held that if a party fails to attend the arbitration
hearing on the due date and time, the arbitrator is at liberty ... petitioner there was no evidence that the
petitioner would not attend the arbitration proceedings. On the
other hand, the petitioner had in fact, attended
Calcutta
354(DB) held that if a party fails to attend the arbitration
hearing on the due date and time, the arbitrator is at liberty ... petitioner there was no evidence that the
petitioner would not attend the arbitration proceedings. On the
other hand, the petitioner had in fact, attended
date of hearing, i.e., on 8th June, 1997, the Contractor attended the
arbitration proceedings with his counsel whereas Executive Engineer
representing the Board though ... submitted that as the Executive Engineer representing
the Board not only attended the arbitration proceedings with his counsel even
after transfer of the Arbitrator, Shri
that ground of statutory disability of the party to submit disputes to arbitration. In that case the son of a bankrupt took up a bill ... claimants now to make this objection. He agreed to the arbitration; he attended the arbitration; he adduced evidence before the Arbitrator; and by his counsel
