audit objection received
by the 1st respondent University, the said audit objection was
subsequently waived by the respondent University considering the
fact that the audit ... indicated that it would view actions by the Universities, in
disregarding audit objections, seriously and that the University had to
ensure that there would
advance to him, on the ground that there had been an audit
objection with regard to the payments made to the petitioner, and a
finding ... petitioner that, while on receipt of a copy of the
audit objections he had preferred Ext.P6 explanation detailing the
sequence of events that
audit objection, the respondent assessing authority
may not consider his objection independently and may be swayed
by the audit objections. Taking note of the said ... examine the same
independently and not feel bound by the audit objections, on the
W.P.(c).No.37213 of 2015 : 2 :
basis of which
submit an explanation
to the 1st respondent University on the objections
raised in the audit note dated 22.6.2009 of the Deputy
Director, LFA Department, Vellanikkara
grant of Higher Grade
to the petitioner was objected to by the respondents pursuant to an
audit objection, and in Ext.P1 proceedings
with effect from 20.12.2004
was however, objected to by the 3rd respondent Joint Director of
Local Fund Audit, who by Ext.P13 communication addressed
V.K.Velu vs Anil Kumar
Author: A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar
Bench: A.K.Jayasankaran
Unknown vs By Advs.Sri.Mansoor.B.H
Author: A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar
Bench: Hrishikesh
ANNUAL RETURNS FOR THE YEAR 2009-2010.
EXHIBIT P10. COPY OF THE AUDIT REPORT DATED 30.9.10.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:-
--------------------------------------- NIL
// True copy ... that the petitioner was not given an
effective opportunity of filing his objections against the proposals of
the respondent and further that
M/S Jaya Fashion Jewellery vs Commercial Tax Officer
Author: A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar
Bench
