Above Average' as per the requirement of the promotion policy, as an 'average' ACR automatically disqualifies a person for promotion ... above average' gradings and all grades above 'high average' in the preceding five years, the award of an 'average' grading
grading in the 5
ACRs, while in case of Petitioner No. 2 Ms. Jyotsna Sood, 2 ACRs
are 'Average' while three ... which has an 'Average' grading and/or that
since there is no benchmark, any 'Average' grading ACR cannot be
termed
Downloaded on - 30/03/2026 20:30:18 :::CIS
3
average ACR. The name of the petitioner was also considered
and he found place ... Accepting Authority
of
both times when the petitioner had been given Average ACRs
during 01.04.2013 to 31.03.2013 and 01.04.2013 to
rt
20.08.2013. All the above
applicant's ACRs are 'Outstanding' except 'Average' ACR for the year 2001-2002 and 'Very Good ... Outstanding' ACRs and it is untenable that only one ACR for the year 2001-2002 suddenly becomes 'Average'. It is only
UNFIT
Prasad 6.3 11
Gopal Good Average Average/ Good 31.5 2006- x 55.5 UNFIT
Singh Average 10
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:KAMAL KUMAR ... Gopal Average Average/ Good Good 31.5 2007-11 x+2 57.5 UNFIT
Singh Average
Average Average/ Good Good Average
UNFIT
Prasad 6.3 11
Gopal Good Average Average/ Good 31.5 2006- x 55.5 UNFIT
Singh Average 10
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:KAMAL KUMAR ... Gopal Average Average/ Good Good 31.5 2007-11 x+2 57.5 UNFIT
Singh Average
Average Average/ Good Good Average
UNFIT
Prasad 6.3 11
Gopal Good Average Average/ Good 31.5 2006- x 55.5 UNFIT
Singh Average 10
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:KAMAL KUMAR ... Gopal Average Average/ Good Good 31.5 2007-11 x+2 57.5 UNFIT
Singh Average
Average Average/ Good Good Average
UNFIT
Prasad 6.3 11
Gopal Good Average Average/ Good 31.5 2006- x 55.5 UNFIT
Singh Average 10
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:KAMAL KUMAR ... Gopal Average Average/ Good Good 31.5 2007-11 x+2 57.5 UNFIT
Singh Average
Average Average/ Good Good Average
years under consideration, was "average". Thus, as per
the applicable standards the "average" grading ACRs is regarded as
routine and undistinguished ... after scrutiny of the ACRs, it was
observed that the ACRs of respondent No.3, which were marked as
"average" for the year
respondent had crossed the efficiency bar on 01.11.1976 and thus,
earlier average ACRs which were for the year ... under:-
1970-71 Average
1971-72 Average
1972-73 Average
1973-74 Satisfactory
1974-75 Good
1975-76 Good
1976-77 Good
