Vellie Mary Andrade vs Glory Immacalate D'Julia And Ors on 27 January, 2017
under Article 226 may require a severely
circumscribed exercise in a given case though, in another, the
use of the power could be wide ... High Court also referred to the decision in the case of Ayodhya
Dube v. Ram Sumer Singh5 , wherein a three-Judge Bench of the
Supreme
under Article 226 may require a severely
circumscribed exercise in a given case though, in another, the
use of the power could be wide ... High Court also referred to the decision in the case of Ayodhya
Dube v. Ram Sumer Singh5 , wherein a three-Judge Bench of the
Supreme
Fr.Rodney Esperance vs Mrs.Vellie M. Andrade & Ors on 27 January, 2017
Author
factual matrix of the case is that Jamalpur P.S.
Case no. 136 of 2000 was instituted under Sections ... aforesaid aspect of the case creates serious doubt about the
prosecution case as there was sufficient hiatus and time for
Patna High Court
factual matrix of the case is that Jamalpur P.S.
Case no. 136 of 2000 was instituted under Sections ... aforesaid aspect of the case creates serious doubt about the
prosecution case as there was sufficient hiatus and time for
Patna High Court
relief is
disallowed on the ground that in the
circumstances of the case it was not a proper
relief (vide Section 39 , Specific Relief ... said
decision requires no consideration, while the
Division Bench case, Dr. Ayodhya Prasad v.
Gangotri 1981 AWC 469 is regarding the
jurisdiction of consolidation authorities
undergo
imprisonment for life.
2. Prosecution case is that complainant Ayodhya Prasad
accompanied by his son Ramkumar (deceased), wife and
daughter had gone to their ... appellant was implicated as an accused in the case.
The testimony of PW-1 Ayodhya Prasad and other witnesses
is not trust worthy
appellants.
2. Briefly stated case of the prosecution is that on 19.11.2006 at about
9:45 a.m., deceased Ayodhya Prasad @ Rahasu had gone ... Court of Judicial
Magistrate, First Class Balodabazar, who, in turn, committed the case to
the Court of Session, Raipur, from where it was received
particularly from
B. Venkatamuni v. C.J. Ayodhya Ram Singh and others .
9. It is the admitted case of both the parties that the
properties