mediator by the Apex Court in the
famous Ayodhya case and ultimately based on the report given
by the petitioner along with other mediators, final ... extracted hereunder:
"5.It is submitted that, In the Ayodhya case
Fakir Mohammad Ibrahim Kalifulla, former judge
Supreme Court of India as Chairman
mediator by the Apex Court in the famous
Ayodhya case and ultimately based on the report given by the
petitioner along with other mediators, final ... extracted hereunder:
"5.It is submitted that, In the Ayodhya case
Fakir Mohammad Ibrahim Kalifulla, former judge
Supreme Court of India as Chairman
private business, in their relation to the facts of
the particular case.”
Page 9 of 14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ... possession;
15. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Ayodhya Singh v.
State of Rajasthan , (1972) 3 SCC 885 held as follows
private business, in their relation to the facts of the
particular case.
Illustrations
The Court may presume:-
(a) That a man who is in possession ... possession;
The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Ayodhya Singh v. State of
Rajasthan , (1972) 3 SCC 885 held as follows
private business, in their relation to the facts of
the particular case.
Illustrations
The Court may presume:-
(a) That a man who is in possession ... possession;
The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Ayodhya Singh v.
State of Rajasthan , (1972) 3 SCC 885 held as follows
confession
of the petitioner. Therefore, the prosecution has proved their case beyond
reasonable doubt that the petitioner had committed theft.
10.Absence of the explanation ... possession;
The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Ayodhya Singh v. State of
Rajasthan , (1972) 3 SCC 885 held as follows
confession
of the petitioner. Therefore, the prosecution has proved their case beyond
reasonable doubt that the petitioner had committed theft.
10.Absence of the explanation ... possession;
The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Ayodhya Singh v. State of
Rajasthan , (1972) 3 SCC 885 held as follows
confession
of the petitioner. Therefore, the prosecution has proved their case beyond
reasonable doubt that the petitioner had committed theft.
10.Absence of the explanation ... possession;
The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Ayodhya Singh v. State of
Rajasthan , (1972) 3 SCC 885 held as follows
confession
of the petitioner. Therefore, the prosecution has proved their case beyond
reasonable doubt that the petitioner had committed theft.
10.Absence of the explanation ... possession;
The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Ayodhya Singh v. State of
Rajasthan , (1972) 3 SCC 885 held as follows
confession of the
petitioner. Therefore, the prosecution has proved their case beyond reasonable
doubt that the petitioner had committed theft.
10.Absence of the explanation ... possession;
The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Ayodhya Singh v. State of
Rajasthan , (1972) 3 SCC 885 held as follows
