raised queries with respect to myriad
aspects of the Ram Janmabhoomi - Ayodhya Dispute case which was pending
adjudication before the Hon'ble Supreme Court ... India. With the
pronouncement of the final judgement in the Ayodhya dispute case declared by
the Supreme Court of India on 9 November
Falt No. 46-C Ayodhya Enclave, Plot
No. 30/2, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi 110085, Ex. President & Anr case ... Case:
1. Background of Dispute: The Appellant is a member of the Delhi Niwas
Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd., Ayodhya Enclave, Rohini, Delhi. A
dispute
behalf of any citizen.
Records of the case reveal that the instant case with three other connected cases had
been heard by the Bench ... aforementioned cases are disposed off accordingly."
In compliance of the aforementioned directions of the Commission, the PIO, JKL
Division/Ayodhya Section, MHA sent
behalf of any citizen.
Records of the case reveal that the instant case with three other connected cases
had been heard by the Bench ... aforementioned cases are disposed off accordingly."
In compliance of the aforementioned directions of the Commission, the PIO, JKL
Division/Ayodhya Section, MHA sent
behalf of any citizen.
Records of the case reveal that the instant case with three other connected cases
had been heard by the Bench ... aforementioned cases are disposed off accordingly."
In compliance of the aforementioned directions of the Commission, the PIO, JKL
Division/Ayodhya Section, MHA sent
behalf of any citizen.
Records of the case reveal that the instant case with three other connected cases had
been heard by the Bench ... aforementioned cases are disposed off accordingly."
In compliance of the aforementioned directions of the Commission, the PIO, JKL
Division/Ayodhya Section, MHA sent
Intimate the date of receiving of court summons through case no. 566/2018
titled as Pradeep Vs. Annapurna & Others as mentioned in point ... date of forwarding of statement of
case provide to him.
(xiv) Intimate whether statement of case alongwith all concerned documents has
been forwarded
Central Public
Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be of the
concerned public Authority. The applicant is, therefore, requested ... Vice Chancellor/Governor, Uttar
Pradesh about Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Awadh University, Ayodhya, hence the PIO vide his
reply had requested him to approach
Sanjay Kumar Verma ...िशकायतकता/Complainant
VERSUS
बनाम
CPIO: Central Bank of India,
Ayodhya ... ितवादीगण /Respondents
Relevant dates emerging from the complaint:
RTI : 27.04.2022 FA : No appeal ... provisions of the RTI
Act .
2. Succinctly facts of the case are that the complainant filed an application dated
27.04.2022 under the Right to Information
Sanjay Kumar Verma ...िशकायतकता/Complainant
VERSUS
बनाम
CPIO: Central Bank of India,
Ayodhya ... ितवादीगण /Respondents
Relevant dates emerging from the complaint ... provisions of the RTI
Act .
2. Succinctly facts of the case are that the complainant filed an application dated
15.03.2022 under the Right to Information
