Mahant Suresh Das and Ors (hereinafter referred to as
'Ayodhya case') was in terms of the solution provided to him by
Bhagwan Shri ... Ayodhya judgment, he would not have missed the woods for
the trees. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the Ayodhya case judgment
(supra
matter of national shame.
7. That after the judgment in Ayodhya case delivered on 9th
November, 2019 the plaintiffs alongwith several other devotees visited Qutub ... Supreme Court in its judgment in Ayodhya Case;
"We see this Bill as a measure to provide and develop
our glorious traditions of love
Title Of The Case :State vs Ayodhya Prasad & Ors. on 20 May, 2015
IN THE COURT OF SH. VIPIN KHARB
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE ... COURTS, DELHI
1.Case No. :1656/2
2.Unique I.D. No. :02401R0179342002
3.Title of the case :State Vs Ayodhya Prasad
never met Ayodhya
Prasad after 06.02.2017 in connection with this case.
Statement of PW7 Ayodhya Prasad - examinationin
chief:
"On 16.03.2017, CD having conversation ... Counsel: (As per the prosecution case, no
voice of complainant was recorded at that point of time).
PW7 Ayodhya Prasad:
Para 3 of examination
Ayodhya Prasad Yadav vs . Manpreet Singh & Ors on 19 September, 2014
IN THE COURT OF SH. AJAY KUMAR JAIN:
PRESIDING OFFICER: MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS ... Ayodhya Prasad Yadav Vs. Manpreet Singh & ors
Injury Case
Sh. Ayodhya Prasad Yadav S/o Sh. Badri Prasad Yadav
SOUTHWEST):DWARKA COURTS:NEW DELHI
SUCCESSION CASE NO. 18/11
Ayodhya Prasad
S/o Sh. Bhaggu Ram
R/o H. No. 12/3
Railway ... certificate in favour of petitioner.
5. In support of the case, the petitioner Ayodhya Prasad has
examined one witness.
(i) PW1 Ayodhya Prasad
basis of complaint of the complainant Sh. Ayodhya Thakur. PW4 Sh.
Page 3 of 7
Ayodhya Thakur deposed that on the fateful ... bitten on the shoulder of
complainant Ayodhya Thakur. The prosecution has proved its case against
accused beyond all shadow of reasonable doubt. Accordingly, accused
withdrawal of the suit can be refused by the court. In any
case, the liberty has not been sought by the plaintiff
company ... aforesaid
posed questions I rely upon law laid down in case titled
'Ayodhya Prashad Vs Chhedi Lal, AIR 2000 MP,184 wherein
prove its
case.
15. In the category of Public witnesses, who testified about the role of
the accused persons were: PW-1 Ayodhya Prasad ... Ayodhya
Prasad and PW-2 Shispal and even PW-6 Mehfooz that they had any
reason to implicate the accused persons falsely in this case
case of the
prosecution doubtful and proceedings being on Ante time than
registration of FIR. This discrepancy strikes at the root of the
prosecution case ... natural. Reliance
in this regard is placed on Ayodhya Singh v. State of Bihar,
Cr CASES 3190/2019 PAGE 18 OF 24
STATE VS. MAHESH
