change to the provisions of this
Act?...The indication is clear...Ayodhya Jhanki
Hai...Mathura Kashi Baaki Hain...This was the slogan ... around 2-2½ inutes. You said that the verdict
on the Ayodhya case came on the board cleverly. But, I
want to refresh your memory
Union
of India and Others etc., (1994) 6 SCC 360 (Ayodhya case),
the Constitution Bench, after a detailed discussion,
summarised the true concept of secularism
legal incidents of what
was non est."
7. In the instant case, the plaintiff has pleaded that it had
purchased the disputed property under ... said decision
requires no consideration, while the
Division Bench case, Ayodhya Prasad
support of his
argument.
In the present case what we find is that vendor Smt.
Vidyawati Devi admitted that she had executed a registered
sale ... said
decision requires no consideration, while the Dvision bench
case, Dr. Ayodhya Prasad vs. Gangotri Prasad is regarding
the jurisdiction of consolidation authorities
under Article 226 may require a severely
circumscribed exercise in a given case though, in another, the
use of the power could be wide ... High Court also referred to the decision in the case of Ayodhya
Dube v. Ram Sumer Singh5 , wherein a three-Judge Bench of the
Supreme
Ayodhya
Parkash, ILR (1973) 1 Punjab & Haryana, P 612; Kailash Nath
Agarwal & Ors. v. Prem Pal Agarwal & Anr. Crl. Misc. case ... Misc. Case
No. 676 of 1981 connected with Crl. Misc. case No. 2753 of
1981, Allahabad High Court: Kailash Vati v. Ayodhya Parkash
appellants.
2. Briefly stated case of the prosecution is that on 19.11.2006 at about
9:45 a.m., deceased Ayodhya Prasad @ Rahasu had gone ... Court of Judicial
Magistrate, First Class Balodabazar, who, in turn, committed the case to
the Court of Session, Raipur, from where it was received
scrutiny and interpretation by various High Courts. In the
case of Rama Ayodhya Missir v. Raghunath Missir (1) and in
the case of Mt. Janki
view
taken in ,hat case was differed to by the Full Bench
decision of the Allahabad High Court in Ayodhya Prasad v.
Bhawani Shanker ... privy Council in Bal Gangadhar
Tilak v. Shrinivas Pandit (3). fiat case, however, did not
directly deal with the use of admissions which are proved
down the criteria for determining such exceptional cases
which would cover all contingencies but indicated some cases
which would justify the High Court to Interfere ... that case the high
Court, after referring to Chinnaswamy (supra), had said:
" In the instant case, we find that
this is a case
