Reverting to facts of present case, no doubt the case of prosecution is that accused-appellant Ayodhya Prasad and deceased accused Rajola have fired ... such a case. But that would not be so in cases where there are eye-witnesses of credibility, though even in such cases
under: --
Hari Shanker Brij Kishore Sri Krishna Roshi
| |
_____________________________________________________
| | | |
Param Hansh Kashi Ayodhya Triyogi Ayodhya
(accused) |
______________________
| | |
Subhash Madho Munendra
(Accused)
19. Ram Nakshatra (PW-5) further ... alongwith accused Ayodhya. The accused Chandradeo and Gurdeli are on visiting terms with Ayodhya. Witness Nakshatra stated that there had been a case under Section
virtually admitted by the appellants as is apparent from the counter case of the appellants. Learned Counsel adds that the evidence ... Manjhi. Referring to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Ayodhya Ram v. State of Bihar reported in 1999 (2) East
point out that as observed by the Apex Court in the case of Ayodhya Ram v. State of Bihar ... superficial or minor injuries on the side of the accused, the prosecution case would not fail on that score. In the present case, the prosecution
again and the principle is now almost well settled. In the case of D. Stephens v. Nosibolla it was observed that the revisional jurisdiction ... Ghosh however referred to a still later decision in the case of Ayodhya v. Ram Kumar to show that the supposed rigidity laid down
belonging to the informant Shiv Kumar and Ayodhya Prasad. Thus, the persons who were sitting with Ayodhya and were warming themselves, were also beaten ... would be deprived of the property of Ayodhya Prasad because of which they had committed murder of Ayodhya Prasad, is not tenable. It is also stated
dead-body to the mortuary, P.W.-8 Constable Ayodhya Prasad, who had deposited the case property in the Sadar Malkhana ... court and has stated that the case property of the deceased was submitted by Constable Ayodhya Prasad to the Malkhana and it was send
case of Jagannath Chowdhary and Ors., 1973 SCC (Cri) 903 in the case of Akalu Ahir and Ors. v. Ramdeo Ram , in the case ... decisions in the case of K. Chinnaswamy Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Anr. , in the case of Ayodhya Dube
1988/90 arising out of
Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 0154 of 1982
===========================================================
1. Ram Uchit Rai, son of Late Shital Rai.
2. Prahlad ... with Bhala and Ram
Ayodhya Singh armed with lathi. Further case that Ram
Ayodhya Singh (illegible) of Bishambarapur ordered to take the
dead body, then
1988/90 arising out of
Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 0154 of 1982
===========================================================
1. Ram Uchit Rai, son of Late Shital Rai.
2. Prahlad ... with Bhala and Ram
Ayodhya Singh armed with lathi. Further case that Ram
Ayodhya Singh (illegible) of Bishambarapur ordered to take the
dead body, then
