three criminal cases bearing Case Crime No.348 of 2019, under Section 406 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Faizabad/ Ayodhya, Case Crime ... each cases i.e. Case Crime No.348 of 2019, under Section 406 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Faizabad/ Ayodhya, Case Crime
change to the provisions of this
Act?...The indication is clear...Ayodhya Jhanki
Hai...Mathura Kashi Baaki Hain...This was the slogan ... around 2-2½ inutes. You said that the verdict
on the Ayodhya case came on the board cleverly. But, I
want to refresh your memory
open for debate having been decided by this Court in the case of Ayodhya Prasad Mishra Vs. State of U.P. & Others [reported ... dated 15.10.2015 was subject matter of the writ petition in the case of Ayodhya Prasad Mishra (supra). Paragraphs 26 to 29 make a discussion
addressed to Sri Vishnu Prasad Agrawal, PCS (J) Special Judicial Magistrate ( Ayodhya Case)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 15, Rae Bareli. By the aforementioned ... case No. 4350 of 2010 arising out of Case Crime No. 198 of 1992, Police Station Ram Janm Bhumi Ayodhya, District Faizabad under Sections
cases mentioned below.
The applicant has stated to be involved in following six cases and obtained bail orders:
(1) Case Crime No. 0302/2022, under ... Kotwali District Ayodhya.
(2) Case Crime No. 0303/2022, under Sections 295 , 295-A , 120-B , 34 IPC, P.S. Kotwali District Ayodhya.
(3) Case
well as order dated 31.03.2023, passed by the Collector, Ayodhya in Case No. 104 of 2023 (State Vs. Ashram Maurya), arising out of Case Crime ... impugned order dated 31.03.2023, passed by the Collector, Ayodhya, in Case No.104 of 2023; State Versus Ashram Maurya, arising out of Case Crime
detained for indefinite period even when principal accused in the case has been released on bail.
2. Petitioner had filed an application under Section ... bail referred the case to a Division Bench as there were two views of this Court; one in the case of Ayodhya Singh v. State
under Article 226 may require a severely
circumscribed exercise in a given case though, in another, the
use of the power could be wide ... High Court also referred to the decision in the case of Ayodhya
Dube v. Ram Sumer Singh5 , wherein a three-Judge Bench of the
Supreme
under Article 226 may require a severely
circumscribed exercise in a given case though, in another, the
use of the power could be wide ... High Court also referred to the decision in the case of Ayodhya
Dube v. Ram Sumer Singh5 , wherein a three-Judge Bench of the
Supreme
dated 18.10.21 passed by the III Additional Sessions Judge Faizabad/Ayodhya in Special Case number 3012/2018; for suspension of sentence and conviction.
The facts ... conduct prosecution would focus on bringing the case to conviction even if it is not a fit case to be so convicted. That
