rejected for a number of reasons,
including sham and bogus backdated agreement to sell, failure to produce
the executants, difference between the value indicated
date of their execution and not subsequently by backdating the
agreement as was alleged.
47.In view of the above, the learned counsel
date of their execution and not subsequently by backdating the
agreement as was alleged.
47.In view of the above, the learned counsel
4172 of 2018 dt.11-04-2018 5
stated that the agreement dated 12.09.2017 which is heavily relied
upon by the petitioner at the time ... stated above. It is therefore,
clear that the agreement in question is a fabricated and backdated
document which has been prepared later on only after
name
of the applicant, bunker delivery note dated
10.5.2018, copy of the agreement between
Morrito Maritime Inc. and the applicant.
8. In response ... alleged
that the documents have been created and
transactions have been backdated to make out
the case that the applicant is the owner
name
of the applicant, bunker delivery note dated
10.5.2018, copy of the agreement between
Morrito Maritime Inc. and the applicant.
8. In response ... alleged
that the documents have been created and
transactions have been backdated to make out
the case that the applicant is the owner
Ram Babu Yadav & 93 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Home
Santosh Kumar And Another vs State Of U.P. And 7 Others on 13 September
Siddhi Vinayak ( A Partnership Firm) ... vs Union Of India on 25 October, 2018
HIGH COURT
made on 30th September, 1998, more
than a year after the purported agreement dated 14th August, 1997 between
the assessee and GIPL. Consideration ... other hand, the Assessing Officer held that the assessee had backdated the
transaction of transfer of shares as the market price of NIIT shares
