Motor Vehicle register. It is quite possible
that a backdated agreement has been brought into existence
by the petitioner for the purpose of this proceeding
2024
Sh. Balbir Singh , Alwar vs. ACIT
16. That allegations of backdating agreements often arise when old stamp
papers are used. However ... stamp paper does not inherently
signify that an agreement has been backdated. The date of execution of the
agreement is a factual matter, typically corroborated
said agreements.
On perusal of the agreements, it transpires
that all the agreements contain payment and
usage terms and details. The agreements also
contain arbitration ... petitioner has alleged the non-
existence of arbitration agreement and that the agreements are
fabricated, backdated and products of fraud without any cogent
and substantial
Crores along with interest as financial debt on the
basis of an agreement dated 11.05.2021. Appellant claims that this is contrary
to the audited records ... Techindia Nirman Limited. Basis the agreement and which
was a non-existent agreement. Appellant claims that he agreement is backdated
by three years. Moreover
they were
told that the same cannot be put in the agreement as the company
changed their policy. However, they would submit it in writing ... open
eyes it had entered into the agreement. Merely by stating that the
record was manipulated backdated, in absence of any evidence to
establish entrustment
issue, especially in view of the
allegations of backdated tenancy receipts intended to complete the sale
agreement. It was further ruled that lifting the corporate
alleged backdating of the
document he submitted that the allotment
letter is only for 5 acres. The lease-cum-sale
agreement has also been executed ... Respondents No.5 and 6 submit that;
11.1. There is no backdating of the allotment letter,
the date as entered is a typographic error
date of signing of the Loan
Agreement is shown as 20.12.2007 on first page of the said agreement while on
the last page ... clerical errors. This clearly betrays signs of likely
interpolation, backdating and fabrication of the Loan Agreement document. In
Page 28 of 32
Company Appeal
date of signing of the Loan
Agreement is shown as 20.12.2007 on first page of the said agreement while on
the last page ... clerical errors. This clearly betrays signs of likely
interpolation, backdating and fabrication of the Loan Agreement document. In
Page 28 of 32
Company Appeal
valid
agreement, and that the dispute did not fall under maritime arbitration. They
terminated the COA on 11.09.2012, backdating it to April ... owner. They emphasized that Seaspray was not the
vessel owner under the agreement and had not notified or kept any vessels
idle for the contract