Agreement, based on which the Arbitration has been
invoked, was a backdated Agreement, which was entered into after the entire
Mugdha 1 of 2
::: Uploaded
revenue is concerned that the assessee has made
agreement with GIDC only after the claim of the assessee was disallowed ... identical, therefore, the claim of the assessee based on the
backdate agreement cannot be considered. We find that the submissions
revenue is concerned that the assessee has made
agreement with GIDC only after the claim of the assessee was disallowed ... identical, therefore, the claim of the assessee based on the
backdate agreement cannot be considered. We find that the submissions
Balasubramanian in collusion with
the 2nd defendant created an agreement with backdate before
the date of Ext.A1 and on the basis
subject
land prior to the appellant, but subsequently by preparing a backdated
sale agreement and on that basis, Specific Performance decree was
granted
Paton Constructions Pvt Ltd vs M/S Malharshanti Enterprises & Ors on 17 September, 2024
Naresh Sevantilal Shah & Anr vs M/S. Malharshanti Enterprises & Ors on 17 September
Paton Constructions Pvt Ltd vs M/S Malharshanti Enterprises & Ors on 17 September, 2024
Manish Jaju vs Malharshanti Enterprises & Ors on 17 September, 2024
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE
Manish Jaju vs Malharshanti Enterprises & Ors on 17 September, 2024
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE
