petitioners were granted actual promotion on 27 th May, 2006. This
promotional order made it clear that the effect of promotion is prospective ... order to the extent it did not give
them backdated seniority or due date of promotion, they should have
moved the Court within a reasonable
with
the respondents-organisation MCD on 24.03.1977.
Subsequently, he was given promotion to the rank of
Draftsman Grade II on ad hoc basis. After much ... objection that if year wise DPCs are conducted
for promotion of the applicant with backdate, then, the
seniority list at respective levels will have
instead of 01.1.2013. His claim for retrospective
promotion is based on his contention that his promotion to the post of
Admin. Assistant ... present OA on
30.6.2019, seeking to treat his promotion granted on 30.3.2007 to be
retrospectively backdated to 1.1.2007. He had accepted his promotion
other evidence
to substantiate their claim. The respondents have,
however, averred that promotion of employees after
induction test held on 04.12.2014 pertained to a matter ... light
of the facts, the plea for backdated regularisation,
maintenance of status quo regarding further promotion as
per list dated 08.04.2014 and for keeping three
application.
In response, the applicant has urged that his
promotion should be given backdated to the date on
which his two juniors took charge ... 2015-S-II/10611 dated 04.01.2016 by
which he was debarred from promotion for one year. He
has alleged that the respondents have accommodated
from the department as he
is getting promotion and seniority from the backdate with the CAT New Delhi Order
dated 1 March
with
Cont. Case (C) No.1151 of 2019
promotion as their services were permanent and not tenure based, has
been rejected by dismissing the writ ... writ petitioner have been granted promotion as
Assistant Professor even before completion of minimum requirement of
three years by backdating the consideration of their entry
obtained by the petitioner leaves a huge scope of
manipulation in the promotion process and therefore makes it an arbitrary
process.
30. It is submitted ... mail and attached a backdated order
i.e., the order dated 21st September, 2020, thereby, rejecting the
petitioner‟s promotion since the year
cover this discrepancy, an illegal
addendum was issued on 15.07.2022, backdating her
absorption to 27.11.2020.
• The Petitioner was promoted to the cadre of
Superintending Engineer ... amended rules. The absorption
backdated to 27.11.2020 was merely a facade to
justify the illegal promotion and alteration of seniority.
16. The respondents are directly
fact that
the petitioner has been working as Laboratory Assistant on promotion.
He further argued that detailed clarification and explanation have been
provided by respondent ... procedure to grant promotion to
an employee with retrospective effect and then submitted a proposal for
granting approval backdated. The proposal therefore was found
