Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 41 (1.14 seconds)

Kumari Sailaja vs D/O Post on 25 March, 2024

eligible GDS were considered by the DPC for promotion they were not issued promotion orders as they had been promoted either to the cadre ... seen in the minutes at Annexure R5. Certain appointments/notional backdated promotion were then given to the various GDS of Trivandrum South Division
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr N C Sinha vs Union Of India on 9 September, 2024

whether the petitioner shall be entitled to notional promotion from a backdate including the consequential benefits. This, according to Mr. Nandakumar, is because ... petitioner is entitled to notional promotion to the post of Additional Member, Railway Board, from a backdate in fresh proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr N C Sinha vs Union Of India on 9 September, 2024

whether the petitioner shall be entitled to notional promotion from a backdate including the consequential benefits. This, according to Mr. Nandakumar, is because ... petitioner is entitled to notional promotion to the post of Additional Member, Railway Board, from a backdate in fresh proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr N C Sinha vs Union Of India on 9 September, 2024

whether the petitioner shall be entitled to notional promotion from a backdate including the consequential benefits. This, according to Mr. Nandakumar, is because ... petitioner is entitled to notional promotion to the post of Additional Member, Railway Board, from a backdate in fresh proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Union Of India vs Mammathu on 12 June, 2024

Tribunal and objected to the claim and submitted that the appointment by promotion itself was after the new Rules had come into effect and therefore ... came into force with effect from 1.1.2004, any promotion effected thereafter, cannot be backdated and therefore, according to him, the point is not covered
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - A Rawal - Full Document

Kum Savitha H A vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 September, 2024

cover this discrepancy, an illegal addendum was issued on 15.07.2022, backdating her absorption to 27.11.2020. • The Petitioner was promoted to the cadre of Superintending Engineer ... amended rules. The absorption backdated to 27.11.2020 was merely a facade to justify the illegal promotion and alteration of seniority. 16. The respondents are directly
Karnataka High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next