Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (2.42 seconds)

Mr N C Sinha vs Union Of India on 9 September, 2024

whether the petitioner shall be entitled to notional promotion from a backdate including the consequential benefits. This, according to Mr. Nandakumar, is because ... petitioner is entitled to notional promotion to the post of Additional Member, Railway Board, from a backdate in fresh proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr N C Sinha vs Union Of India on 9 September, 2024

whether the petitioner shall be entitled to notional promotion from a backdate including the consequential benefits. This, according to Mr. Nandakumar, is because ... petitioner is entitled to notional promotion to the post of Additional Member, Railway Board, from a backdate in fresh proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr N C Sinha vs Union Of India on 9 September, 2024

whether the petitioner shall be entitled to notional promotion from a backdate including the consequential benefits. This, according to Mr. Nandakumar, is because ... petitioner is entitled to notional promotion to the post of Additional Member, Railway Board, from a backdate in fresh proceedings before the Central Administrative Tribunal
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kum Savitha H A vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 September, 2024

cover this discrepancy, an illegal addendum was issued on 15.07.2022, backdating her absorption to 27.11.2020. • The Petitioner was promoted to the cadre of Superintending Engineer ... amended rules. The absorption backdated to 27.11.2020 was merely a facade to justify the illegal promotion and alteration of seniority. 16. The respondents are directly
Karnataka High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1