father of the applicant Darabshah @ Dali Patel passed
away and was created backdated in order to usurp the
land of the complainant and his family ... members. He
submits that backdating a document also amounts to
forgery of a document, even if, signatures on the
document are genuine, as the definition
alleged
that the documents have been created and
transactions have been backdated to make out
the case that the applicant is the owner ... document created for
the purpose of this litigation and the same is
backdated and the same is neither notarized
nor apostilled as required
alleged
that the documents have been created and
transactions have been backdated to make out
the case that the applicant is the owner ... document created for
the purpose of this litigation and the same is
backdated and the same is neither notarized
nor apostilled as required
Punambhai Ashabhai Waghela vs Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd on 4 September, 2025
Author: A. S
award dated
16.06.2011 passed under Section 11 of the Act, 1894 is
backdated award and no amount of compensation is paid to
the petitioners ... reveal that award
passed under Section 11 of the Act, 1894 is backdated and
bald averments made in this regard will not persuade this
Court
20699/2016 JUDGMENT
backdated order dated 28.11.2016 has been passed. That the
present petition has been preferred with the aforesaid prayers
solely on the ground ... that the communication dated 28.11.2016 is
backdated and said decision has been taken only with a view to get
out of the interim stay granted
While the allegation of the petitioner is that the
said notice was backdated, therein the petitioner was called
upon by the respondent to show cause
submitted well in time but the Mamlatdar found that the date was
backdated and it was found to be after 15 days from the date ... that the purshis was not submitted well in time and
there was backdating of the purshis for reporting to the Mamlatdar,
it could be said
petitioner wrote an
application to the department but the same was backdate
application that was presented to the Regional Transport Office,
Page
fact that the contract has been backdated and
also the fact that defendant No.3 was not in existence at the
purported time of execution
