Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 581 (1.01 seconds)

Manju Yadav vs Union Of India on 25 November, 2013

vacancies remained unfilled/backlog vacancies for the relevant years which is as under:- Vacancies remained unfilled/Back log vacancies due to returning of dossiers ... backlog reserved vacancies are not created. If, even after making such efforts, the reserved vacancies are not filled and backlog reserved vacancies are carried forward
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Amal Sarkar vs Rrc (E Railway) on 6 June, 2018

ppsts, was erroneo. The directiof the High Court to work out backlog vacancies for the disabled personsp thejQal cadre strength in different establishments within ... reserving 3% of the vacancies [1% for OH], against the vacancies notified in 2012 have not computed backlog vacancies of 2010, and therefore, despite recurring
Central Administrative Tribunal - Kolkata Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shivdesh Sharma vs Gnctd on 18 April, 2026

balance vacancies remaining after excluding such reserved posts. Thus, from the total 706 vacancies, upon deduction of 492 reserved vacancies, the remaining vacancies have been ... Constitution. Consequently, only 211 vacancies remain as current vacancies for open recruitment, and 10% thereof, i.e., 21 vacancies, have been duly earmarked
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

V Ravi Varma Syparaju vs Revenue on 24 March, 2026

deviating from these binding instructions. 11. The action of not filling backlog vacancies that arose prior to 20.09.2024 as per the old Recruitment Rules ... vacancies of the subsequent year. Further, as per OM dated 11.12.2023, unfilled vacancies are to be carried forward and considered in subsequent vacancy years
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Surender Singh vs Revenue on 24 March, 2026

deviating from these binding instructions. 11. The action of not filling backlog vacancies that arose prior to 20.09.2024 as per the old Recruitment Rules ... vacancies of the subsequent year. Further, as per OM dated 11.12.2023, unfilled vacancies are to be carried forward and considered in subsequent vacancy years
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

D Narasimha vs South Central Railway on 15 October, 2025

Railways is deemed to be prior to 22.12.2003 against the backlog vacancy of ST and accordingly extend the benefit of coverage under Railway Services (Pension ... 2025 issued to fill up the backlog vacancies pertaining to the period prior to 11.12.2004. The said backlog vacancies pertain to the unfilled vacancies
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next