auto belonging to the first respondent did not wear the requisite badge, which he is bound to wear. It has also been submitted that ... driver of the first respondent's auto has not got the badge from the Regional Transport Organisation to drive the auto at the time
maxi cab vehicle, but did not have the requisite endorsement or badge
to drive such a vehicle and as such, the second respondent ... driver of the tata sumo car did not have a valid badge endorsement in
his licence and that the (deceased) Jayakannan was under the influence
maxi cab vehicle, but did not have the requisite endorsement or badge
to drive such a vehicle and as such, the second respondent ... driver of the tata sumo car did not have a valid badge endorsement in
his licence and that the (deceased) Jayakannan was under the influence
maxi cab vehicle, but did not have the requisite endorsement or badge
to drive such a vehicle and as such, the second respondent ... driver of the tata sumo car did not have a valid badge endorsement in
his licence and that the (deceased) Jayakannan was under the influence
maxicab vehicle but as he did not have the
endorsement on badge in his licence to drive the vehicle, the policy conditions
of insurance ... driver of the tata sumo car did not have a valid badge endorsement in
his licence and that the (deceased) Jayakannan was under the influence
time of accident and that he did not possess the requisite badge for the period
from the year 2005 to 2008. He deposed that ... drive the vehicle and that he did not
possess the requisite badge at the time of accident. Hence, the Tribunal on
observing that the second
maxicab vehicle but as he did not have the
endorsement on badge in his licence to drive the vehicle, the policy conditions
of insurance ... driver of the tata sumo car did not have a valid badge endorsement in
his licence and that the (deceased) Jayakannan was under the influence
respondent's
auto did not have the requisite badge to drive the vehicle at the time of
accident. However, the Tribunal observed on scrutiny ... driver of the auto had been issued with the requisite badge. Hence, the
Tribunal on observing that the respondents had not taken the necessary steps
drive light motor
vehicle and that he did not have a requisite badge to drive the first
respondent's goods vehicle ... necessary
for the driver of the vehicle to get the badge only from their office and that
he could obtain it from
first respondent's driver did not have a valid licence and badge to
drive the commercial vehicle. The averments in the claim regarding disability ... evidence that
the first respondent's driver did not have a badge endorsement in the licence to
drive the auto. R.W.2 working
