Srichakra Tyres Ltd. vs Collector Of Central Excise on 12 March, 1999
indicated in secret code in the Kabalas. Secretary, invariably is the badge of fraud. The Kabalas did not show that any extra work was done
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.50 seconds)Chandra Lakshmi Laminated Safety Glass ... vs C.C.E. on 10 March, 1995
that pipe fittings, though they may have a distinctive name or badge of identification in the market, are not pipes and tubes. It is true
Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. vs Collector Of Central Excise on 31 July, 1989
mandate of a judicial authority or a quasi-judicial authority with the badge of an "Order".
22A. Now we also find Rule
Punjab Ex-Servicemen Corporation vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 6 October, 2006
material and other undesirable activities i.e. absenteeism, unpunctuality, non-wearing of badges identity discs and other indiscipline among the workers.
And whereas PESCO agrees ... other activities relating to manpower i.e. absenteeism, unpunctuality and bearing of badges/identity discs and other indiscipline amongst the workers.
8. It is also
Collector Of Central Excise vs J.K. White Cement Works on 23 August, 1994
that a distinctive name or badge of identification in the market does not necessarily lead to classification under that heading; that under a residuary entry
Collector Of Central Excise vs Kohinoor Rubber Mills on 16 December, 1992
rubber rolls are a specific description. The product is given a specific badge of rubber rolls for accurate identification in the market. The learned
Lachhman Dass Behari Lal vs Collector Of C. Excise on 18 February, 1994
that pipe fittings, though they may have a distinctive name or badge of identification in the market, are not pipes and tubes. It is true
True Forge Pvt. Ltd. vs Collector Of Central Excise on 9 April, 1999
that pipe fittings, though they may have a distinctive name or badge of identification in the market, are not pipes and tubes, while all pipes
Collector Of Central Excise vs L And T Ltd. on 22 October, 1992
that pipe fittings, though they have a distinct name or badge of identification in the market are not pipes and tubes. The Court held that
Ahmedabad Advance Mills Ltd. vs Collr. Of C. Ex. on 18 September, 1996
indicated in secret code in the Kabalas. Secrecy, invariably is the badge of fraud. The Kabalas do not show that any extra work was done