catena of judgments, that if the contract is for supply of workers,
the worker supplied by the contractor shall work under the direction,
supervision ... permanent worker. Hence, it cannot be said that they are "badli" workers.
24. It is further submitted that equal work for equal
supported by any evidence or there was no basis of these
workers having worked during the period in dispute with the
petitioner. The liability ... fastened on the petitioner...."
21. The petitioner, the respondent RPFC and workers union have also
filed their written submissions dated 4th January
supported by any evidence or there was no basis of these
workers having worked during the period in dispute with the
petitioner. The liability ... fastened on the petitioner...."
21. The petitioner, the respondent RPFC and workers union have also
filed their written submissions dated 4th January
supported by any evidence or there was no basis of these
workers having worked during the period in dispute with the
petitioner. The liability ... fastened on the petitioner...."
21. The petitioner, the respondent RPFC and workers union have also
filed their written submissions dated 4th January
supported by any evidence or there was no basis of these
workers having worked during the period in dispute with the
petitioner. The liability ... fastened on the petitioner...."
21. The petitioner, the respondent RPFC and workers union have also
filed their written submissions dated 4th January
supported by any evidence or there was no basis of these
workers having worked during the period in dispute with the
petitioner. The liability ... fastened on the petitioner...."
21. The petitioner, the respondent RPFC and workers union have also
filed their written submissions dated 4th January
supported by any evidence or there was no basis of these
workers having worked during the period in dispute with the
petitioner. The liability ... fastened on the petitioner...."
21. The petitioner, the respondent RPFC and workers union have also
filed their written submissions dated 4th January
supported by any evidence or there was no basis of these
workers having worked during the period in dispute with the
petitioner. The liability ... fastened on the petitioner...."
21. The petitioner, the respondent RPFC and workers union have also
filed their written submissions dated 4th January
supported by any evidence or there was no basis of these
workers having worked during the period in dispute with the
petitioner. The liability ... fastened on the petitioner...."
21. The petitioner, the respondent RPFC and workers union have also
filed their written submissions dated 4th January
supported by any evidence or there was no basis of these
workers having worked during the period in dispute with the
petitioner. The liability ... fastened on the petitioner...."
21. The petitioner, the respondent RPFC and workers union have also
filed their written submissions dated 4th January
