Part I reads as follows:
" to employ workmen as " badlis", casuals or temporaries and to continue them as such for years, with ... object of depriving them of the status and privileges of permanent workmen."
Hence commission of such an unfair labour practice by the employer
respondent did not ask the claimants to individually prove that they are workmen eligible to invoke the provisions of the Act. The first respondent, having ... held that an apprentice or a badli worker could not be included in the word workman referred to in Sections
file of the Commissioner for
Workmen Compensation (Deputy Commissioner of Labour), Madurai, claiming
compensation for the injuries sustained by him.
3.The Deputy Commissioner ... claim of the 1st respondent/applicant bad for non issuance
of notice under Section 10 of the Workmen Compensation Act before filing the
claim petition
reasonable and directed
the Management to extend similar relief to 18 other workmen, who
are parties in the writ appeal. Therefore, the first respondent
Tribunal ... Court justifying the lockout, was bad
and granted the relief for payment of 50% of the backwages to the
workmen, who are denied work from
This was done because the respondent-Corporation was in a bad financial shape. The contention that the settlement of 13-9-1990 is not binding ... appellants because they were in a Supervisory category and were not workmen and hence the Union had no right to represent them, has no substance
reasons already stated.
(iii) (1976) 4 SCC 736 ( Herbertsons Limited vs The Workmen of Herbertsons Limited and Ors ), wherein, the Apex Court has held ... bits and pieces and hold some parts good and acceptable and others bad. Unless it can be demonstrated that the objectionable portion is such that
matter to decide whether the settlement accepted by the majority of the workmen is to be considered as just and fair. It is also held ... bits and pieces and hold some parts good and acceptable and others bad. Once cordiality is established between the employer and labour in arriving
first respondent, they were not taken into account, as a result, a bad order has been passed by the first respondent, hence, the same ... State Warehousing Corporation , (2010) 3 SCC 192 for the proposition that the workman is not required to prove that he had worked for a period
Award, dated 08.10.2009, directed the petitioner / Management to reinstate the second respondent / workman with continuity of service with full backwages and all other attendant benefits ... counsel appearing for the petitioner / Management has submitted that the second respondent / workman after a lapse of twenty years without any valid reason raised
mother of the deceased filed W.C.No.31 of 2008 under
Workmen Compensation Act , before the Deputy Commissioner of Labour,
Tirunelveli for compensation ... part of the
driver of the vehicle which was in a bad condition and hence, the negligence
could be attributable to the deceased
