employment the
corporation will have no occasion or necessity to employ badly workmen it
is hoped in future. Though part time employees will continue ... thus :-
"The Management agrees to consider the temporary/part-tim/badli workmen
employed by the petitioner for 85 days in an two years
corporation will have no occasion or
necessity to employ badly workmen it is
hoped in future. Though part time employees
will continue ... read thus :-
“The Management agrees to consider the
temporary/part-tim/badli workmen employed by
the petitioner for 85 days in an two years
applies only to a badli or temporary workman. It is submitted that
the workmen concerned are neither badli nor temporary but daily
wage earners ... badlis' or substitutes;
(d) temporary workmen;
(e) casual workmen; and
(f) apprentices.
4-C. A badli or temporary workman
under Section 25U of the
Act. Therefore, the retrenchment of the workman is bad in law, as the same
is in blatant violation of Sections ... fact and held that the order of termination passed against
the workman is bad in law, the same being void ab initio
under Section 25U of the Act. Therefore,
the retrenchment of the workman is bad in law, as the
same is in blatant violation of Sections ... fact and held that the order of termination passed
against the workman is bad in law, the same being void
ab initio
though the case is again pertaining to
Badli workman, it is altogether on a different
footing, inasmuch as in such reported case the
issue ... which provides several conditions precedent
to retrench the workman and provides that no
workman employed in any industry, who has been in
continuous service
issue that the notice of retrenchment served upon the concerned workmen
is bad in law. Relevant paragraph of the said case is extracted as under ... award in favour of the concerned workmen are
either erroneous or bad in law and warrant interference by this Court.
The Industrial Court, being
employer challenging the award wherein Tribunal held that
termination of workman was bad in law and he is entitled for
grant of compensation whereas ... 5625/13 and WP No. 5835/13 are filed by
the workman challenging the award to the extent
reinstatement with back wages is not ordered
workman and if the workmen are more than one, it is
sufficient for making a reference and the Trade Union Act gives
emphasis on workmen ... group
of workmen IS excluded, unless the workmen as a body or
a considerable section of them make common cause with
individual workman
issue that the
notice of retrenchment served upon the concerned
workmen is bad in law. Relevant paragraph of the
said case is extracted as under ... award in favour of the concerned
workmen are either erroneous or bad in law and
warrant interference by this Court.
24. The Industrial Court, being
