stated that JJB vide the order dated 27.10.2021
declined to grant bail to respondent No. 2. When this order was
put to challenge before ... District and Sessions
Judge passed an order dated 01.12.2021 declining to grant bail
to respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 2, thereafter, filed
Criminal Revision
outcome of the
criminal appeal. He was directed to be released on bail on
furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety thereto subject ... under :
“389. Suspension of sentence pending the appeal; release
of appellant on bail.—(1) Pending any appeal by a
convicted person, the Appellate Court
appeal and Respondent No.2 was directed to be released on bail,
subject to certain conditions imposed on him by Special Judge
(POCSO) Karauli (Rajasthan ... recorded only the
following reasons before enlarging Respondent No.2 on bail:
“5. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of
the appellant
Section 482 1 of the Bharatiya
1
‘482. Direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arrest.—(1) When any
person has reason to believe ... Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) by the respondent, whereby he
was granted anticipatory bail.
BRIEF FACTUAL OVERVIEW:
4. The respondent, an officer borne on the Indian
good or
sufficient ground so as to enlarge the applicant/appellant on
bail during the pendency of present appeal.”
9. In such circumstances, referred ... execution of sentence pending the appeal and release of
the appellant on bail. There is a distinction between
bail and suspension of sentence
case of Prajith Thayyil Kallil Vs. State of Maharashtra
in Anticipatory Bail Application No.161/2022 and connected
matters decided on 5.5.20221. The discussion ... Court, some applications are filed before the
learned Single Judge taking up bail applications and some matters
are filed before the Division Bench seeking writ
JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN
SHANKAR
JUDGMENT
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.
CRL.M.(BAIL) 359/2022
1. The present application has been filed by the Appellant under Section ... Arguing that releasing the Appellant on bail and suspending his
sentence during the pendency of the Appeal would not only be against
case of Prajith Thayyil Kallil Vs. State of Maharashtra
in Anticipatory Bail Application No.161/2022 and connected
matters decided on 5.5.20221. The discussion ... Court, some applications are filed before the
learned Single Judge taking up bail applications and some matters
are filed before the Division Bench seeking writ
case of Prajith Thayyil Kallil Vs. State of Maharashtra
in Anticipatory Bail Application No.161/2022 and connected
matters decided on 5.5.20221. The discussion ... Court, some applications are filed before the
learned Single Judge taking up bail applications and some matters
are filed before the Division Bench seeking writ
case of Prajith Thayyil Kallil Vs. State of Maharashtra
in Anticipatory Bail Application No.161/2022 and connected
matters decided on 5.5.20221. The discussion ... Court, some applications are filed before the
learned Single Judge taking up bail applications and some matters
are filed before the Division Bench seeking writ
