included the report of
the Chemical Examiner, Ex. P.TT and report of Serology, Ex.
P.TT/1 and report of Ballistic Expert ... pellets.
8. Thereafter, the learned trial Judge, relying on the
ballistic report, Ext. P.UU, opined that the .12 bore fired
cartridges cases
incident of obstruction on the road.
5. He stated that the ballistics report (Ex. PW-24/B) had not mentioned
that the bullet recovered from ... absence of recovery of the back
portion of the cartridge, the ballistics report cannot be regarded as
conclusive.
6. Learned counsel for the appellant-convict
seizure of arms from
Appellant Rajesh, FSL report and ballistic report Ex.P/18.
9. Counsel for the appellants while assailing the order of conviction ... duly proved,
further FSL report and ballistic report does not have evidentiary value. FSL
report and ballistic report are doubtful as they were sent
been
proved through Ballistic Expert in the Court. The Ballistic Report does not
show that 23 pellets were recovered from the dead body of deceased ... prosecution has failed to examine the
Ballistic Expert in order to prove the Ballistic Expert Report.
(iv) Lastly, even if the case of prosecution
seizure of arms from
Appellant Rajesh, FSL report and ballistic report Ex.P/18.
9. Counsel for the appellants while assailing the order of conviction ... duly proved,
further FSL report and ballistic report does not have evidentiary value. FSL
report and ballistic report are doubtful as they were sent
seized firearm and the empty cartridges were sent for
3
ballistic examination vide ballistic report Ex.P39. It has been reported
that the empty ... challenge the veracity of
the report present in ExP-39.
7
11. The report of a Ballistic Officer, who is a Government scientific expert
submitted with
the laboratory report. Also, electropherograms were not submitted with the
laboratory reports.
34. Turning next to the ballistic reports and the prosecution ... submitted that the articles
were received by the ballistic expert only on 14.07.2011; the ballistics report
Ex. P120 is dated 30.07.2011.
35. Doubts were expressed
stated that they recovered 10 bullets.
35. Ballistic Report: The Trial Court held that the ballistic report is not
admissible in evidence as the requirements ... nothing against Ashok Kumar
Chandel to falsely implicate him.
51. Ballistic Report: Accepting the ballistic report, the High Court observed
that the report was forwarded
FIR must be
in the handwriting of the informant. Neither is it necessary to doubt the
FIR because Girjesh Rai was not examined. The FIR ... night” and that he does not remember the exact
time.
Ballistic Report does not confirm that the shots were fired from the
recovered weapon
medical evidence, recovery of incriminating articles. The evidence
of ballistic expert and the ballistic report also provide sufficient
corroboration to the testimony of Chandan ... alleged to
be used in commission of offence, serological report, FSL report as also
ballistic report. The evidence, oral and documentary, led by the
prosecution
