Madan Lal Kapur vs Subhash Lal Kapur And Ors. on 23 July, 2003
Madan Lal Kapur vs Subhash Lal Kapur And Ors. on 23 July, 2003
Equivalent citations
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.42 seconds)Parshotam Dass vs State Of Haryana on 10 April, 2003
Mithilesh Kumari v. Prem Bihari Khare, Section 4 of the Banami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 was, it is submitted, wrongly held
Suresh Mahto And Anr. vs Sant Kumar Mahto on 18 August, 2003
defendant Ful-mati Kuar respectively as to whether these two acquisitions are banami in their respective names acquired by Ram Sewak Mahto. It is equally
N. Ganesan vs Nagarathnam (Died) on 19 June, 2003
family. The reason advanced by the plaintiffs is that the purchase was
banami in order to avoid the Government Servants' Conduct Rules. The said
N. Ganesan vs Nagarathnam (Died) on 19 June, 2003
family. The reason advanced by the plaintiffs is that the purchase was
banami in order to avoid the Government Servants' Conduct Rules. The said
1