acknowledged bapi
rights. Similarly, Rule 64 of the Rules also acknowledged bapi
rights. As such, the declaration for recognition of a bapi patta ... judgment dated 30.11.1981 has observed that the pattas are
permanent pattas and are bapi pattas issued in accordance with
the Bapidar Rules and therefore, Marwar
since expired)-his legal representatives are on record,
were granted `Bapi Patta' No. 14 for agricultural land
measuring about 603.16 bighas in Village Gevan ... slabs which were obstructing the flow of water and, therefore,
"Bapi Patta" No. 14 granting 603.16 bighas of land was
cancelled. The Division
decree, the appellants prefer this
appeal on the grounds that the Bapi patta issued in fabour of the
predecessors of the appellants is not transferable ... Bapi rights can be declared in favour of the respondents-
plaintiffs. The admitted position of the present case is that if Bapi
patta was granted
appellant has
been dismissed.
3. It is contended that a Bapi Patta has been issued in
favour of the respondents ... Bapi Patta, it has
been clearly mentioned that the patta as issued has been
cancelled. The appellant was afforded opportunity before his patta
was cancelled
land was granted to him by Municipal Committee Begun under a Bapi Patta dated March 16, 1959 after receipt of Nazrana ... lawful possession over the plot of land in pursuance of the Bapi Patta granted to him by Municipal Board Begun and the defendants have
MMCR'); the declaration was sought on the ground that a
Bapi Patta issued in the year 1946 existed in the names of
Gulam Suleman ... have no relation whatsoever
qua the persons, who were holding the Bapi Patta and that the
applicants were in possession of the mine in question
aforesaid1 land belonged to Rarma Kishan and that 'Bapi Patta' in the said land had been issued in favour of Rama Kishan
under the tenancy of the plaintiffs, who held a 'Bapi Patta' dated December 4, 1942 in respect of the aforesaid agricultural lands, including
State.
9. The State therefore could not give a Bapi Patta of land which never vested in it to Mchta Jag-annath Singh ... State could not sell it or give it in Bapi Patta to Mehta Jagannath Singh.
13. The next question is what relief we should grant
father of the accused Prabhu, Ariun and Mewa Ram and a Bapi Patta had also been issued in his name. It is further stated
