Bsnl vs Narain Dass Kataria on 25 March, 2010
bills, then the
remedy under the Consumer Protection Act
is by implication barred."
9. Since the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10596 (1.36 seconds)Sanjay Kumar Mishra, vs Public Information Officer (Pio), & ... on 8 January, 2015
jurisdiction of other forums in such matters,
therefore, is barred by necessarily implication.
19. Section 23
of RTI Act, which bars jurisdiction of Courts ... bills, then the remedy
under the Consumer Protection Act is by implication barred. Reliance was placed
upon the earlier decision in Thiruvalluvar
Transport Corporation
Spice Communication Pvt. Ltd. vs Gurinder Kaur on 22 February, 2010
bills, then the
remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is by
implication barred."
6. It was also observed by the Hon'ble Supreme
Shri Vivek Bharadwaj vs Vodafone Essar East Ltd on 12 February, 2014
bills , then the remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is by implication barred.'
In the present case the dispute has its origin
The General Manager, Bsnl And Others vs Meenakshi Annie And Others on 30 November, 2009
The General Manager, Bsnl And Others vs Meenakshi Annie And Others on 30 November, 2009
General Manager (Leased Circuit), Mtnl ... vs Sandeep Dattaraya Uddhao, And Others on 6 November, 2012
then the remedy under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is
by implication barred. Section 7B of
the Telegraph Act reads as under :-
7B Arbitration
M/S Reliance India Info-Com Ltd., vs Ramesh Chander Sharma & Others on 2 July, 2010
bills, then the remedy under the Consumer
Protection Act is by implication barred. Section 7-B of the Telegraph Act reads
as under:
Section
Shri. Sebastiao Teles, vs Manager, Bsnl Goa on 12 March, 2013
bills, then the remedy under the
C.P. Act is by implication barred. The
Apex Court then referred to Section
Mrs. Adelkar Pratibha B. & Ors. vs Shivaji Estate Livestock& Farms Pvt. ... on 16 February, 2015
bills, then the remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is by implication barred.
13. It would be seen from a perusal of the provisions contained
M/S Bharti Cellular Limited vs Sudarshan Kumar on 24 February, 2011
bills, then the
remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is by
implication barred. Section 7B of the Telegraph Act
reads as under:
" Section