entire suit itself can be disposed of as not maintainable or is barred under O.7 and R.11 of the Civil Procedure Code, Court ... stage. Besides this, it does not either expressly or by: necessary implication provide that jurisdiction under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Code should
complete code in itself which expressly or by specific
implication bars the application of all other laws. It is
crucial and significant that there
then the remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is by implication barred and that the special law overrides the general
civil nature excepting those whose cognizance is expressly or by necessary implication barred. Consequently, the Court pointed out that Order VII, Rule
bills, then the
remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is by
implication barred. Section 7B of the Telegraph Act
reads as under:
" Section
bills, then the remedy under the Consumer Protectin
Act is by implication barred.
6. Section 7-B of the Telegraph Act reads as
under
bills, then the remedy under the
Consumer Protection Act is by implication barred. Section 7B
of the Telegraph Act reads as under:
" Section
application before the District Forum
and pleaded that the consumer complaint is barred by Section 7B of
the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and the same ... bills, then the remedy under
the Consumer Protection Act , is by implication, barred. In support of
his submission, learned counsel pressed into service the decision
barred. In the above
said ruling it was held that in view of
Section 7B of the Telegraph Act there is an implied bar ... thereby the
remedy under the Consumer Protection Act is by implication barred. In view of the above citation this appeal
deserves to be allowed
pecuniary jurisdiction, unless their
cognizance is expressly or by necessary implication barred. Such suit would not
be maintainable. It is true that ordinarily, the civil ... been
prescribed in the rules and is being followed. By necessary implication, the
cognizance of the civil cause has been excluded. As a consequence
