Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2504 (1.38 seconds)

A.Kaleur Rahman vs P.Kannan on 15 November, 2016

only is the suit or proceedings before the Civil Court barred in respect of the matters under Section 126 or Section 127 or before ... pecuniary jurisdiction, unless their cognizance is expressly or by necessary implication barred. Such suit would not be maintainable. It is true that ordinarily, the Civil
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Sonsai vs Executive Engineer on 13 July, 2016

take cognizance of the cases arising under the Act, by necessary implication is barred. Paragraph 2 and 3 of the report states as under ... take cognisance of the cases arising under the Act, by necessary implication, stood barred. The Civil Court thereby is devoid of jurisdiction to give declaration
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next